SEC Filing | Bank of Hawaii Corporation

View:

Download DOC

Download PDF

Download XLS

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x		Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
		for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010

or

o		Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
		for the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 1-6887

BANK OF HAWAII CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		99-0148992
(State of incorporation)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

130 Merchant Street, Honolulu, Hawaii		96813
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

1-888-643-3888

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer x		Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o No x

As of April 13, 2010, there were 48,041,730 shares of common stock outstanding.

Table of Contents

Bank of Hawaii Corporation

Form 10-Q

Index

			Page

Part I - Financial Information

	Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)

		Consolidated Statements of Income – Three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009		2

		Consolidated Statements of Condition – March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009, and March 31, 2009		3

		Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity – Three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009		4

		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009		5

		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)		6

	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		21

	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		42

	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		42

Part II - Other Information

	Item 1A.	Risk Factors		42

	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		42

	Item 6.	Exhibits		42

Signatures			43

Table of Contents

Bank of Hawaii Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)

			Three Months Ended
			March 31,
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	2010			2009
Interest Income
Interest and Fees on Loans and Leases	$	77,271		$	86,592
Income on Investment Securities
Trading	—			594
Available-for-Sale	43,841			32,301
Held-to-Maturity	1,863			2,567
Deposits	13			10
Funds Sold	309			577
Other	277			276
Total Interest Income	123,574			122,917
Interest Expense
Deposits	8,307			17,025
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase	6,429			6,652
Funds Purchased	7			5
Long-Term Debt	1,178			2,173
Total Interest Expense	15,921			25,855
Net Interest Income	107,653			97,062
Provision for Credit Losses	20,711			24,887
Net Interest Income After Provision for Credit Losses	86,942			72,175
Noninterest Income
Trust and Asset Management	11,708			11,632
Mortgage Banking	3,464			8,678
Service Charges on Deposit Accounts	13,814			13,386
Fees, Exchange, and Other Service Charges	14,504			14,976
Investment Securities Gains, Net	20,021			56
Insurance	2,715			5,641
Other	5,556			15,996
Total Noninterest Income	71,782			70,365
Noninterest Expense
Salaries and Benefits	44,564			47,028
Net Occupancy	10,144			10,328
Net Equipment	4,558			4,316
Professional Fees	1,992			2,549
FDIC Insurance	3,100			1,814
Other	17,348			21,898
Total Noninterest Expense	81,706			87,933
Income Before Provision for Income Taxes	77,018			54,607
Provision for Income Taxes	24,282			18,567
Net Income	$	52,736		$	36,040
Basic Earnings Per Share	$	1.10		$	0.76
Diluted Earnings Per Share	$	1.09		$	0.75
Dividends Declared Per Share	$	0.45		$	0.45
Basic Weighted Average Shares	47,914,412			47,566,005
Diluted Weighted Average Shares	48,289,427			47,802,249

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).

Table of Contents

Bank of Hawaii Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Condition (Unaudited)

	March 31,			December 31,			March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2010			2009			2009
Assets
Interest-Bearing Deposits	$	4,910		$	8,755		$	5,031
Funds Sold	269,410			291,546			895,595
Investment Securities
Available-for-Sale	5,447,239			5,330,834			3,106,608
Held-to-Maturity (Fair Value of $173,646; $186,668; and $233,633)	167,099			181,018			228,177
Loans Held for Sale	11,143			16,544			24,121
Loans and Leases	5,610,081			5,759,785			6,338,726
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses	(146,358		)	(143,658		)	(134,416		)
Net Loans and Leases	5,463,723			5,616,127			6,204,310
Total Earning Assets	11,363,524			11,444,824			10,463,842
Cash and Noninterest-Bearing Deposits	355,398			254,766			299,393
Premises and Equipment	110,310			110,976			114,536
Customers’ Acceptances	677			1,386			822
Accrued Interest Receivable	42,180			45,334			36,928
Foreclosed Real Estate	3,192			3,132			346
Mortgage Servicing Rights	26,082			25,970			23,528
Goodwill	31,517			31,517			34,959
Other Assets	502,790			496,922			473,774
Total Assets	$	12,435,670		$	12,414,827		$	11,448,128

Liabilities
Deposits
Noninterest-Bearing Demand	$	2,194,280		$	2,252,083		$	1,970,041
Interest-Bearing Demand	1,669,586			1,609,413			1,926,576
Savings	4,515,597			4,405,969			3,905,709
Time	1,114,621			1,142,211			1,410,465
Total Deposits	9,494,084			9,409,676			9,212,791
Funds Purchased	8,888			8,888			9,665
Short-Term Borrowings	7,317			6,900			10,000
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase	1,529,047			1,618,717			844,283
Long-Term Debt	90,309			90,317			59,003
Banker’s Acceptances	677			1,386			822
Retirement Benefits Payable	36,895			37,435			54,450
Accrued Interest Payable	7,766			7,026			10,010
Taxes Payable and Deferred Taxes	224,112			229,140			258,505
Other Liabilities	97,203			109,369			154,664
Total Liabilities	11,496,298			11,518,854			10,614,193
Shareholders’ Equity
Common Stock ($.01 par value; authorized 500,000,000 shares; issued / outstanding: March 31, 2010 - 57,027,543 / 48,040,830; December 31, 2009 - 57,028,239 / 48,018,943; and March 31, 2009 - 57,019,595 / 47,803,544)	570			569			569
Capital Surplus	494,653			494,318			491,352
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)	18,063			6,925			(1,319		)
Retained Earnings	874,305			843,521			802,195
Treasury Stock, at Cost (Shares: March 31, 2010 - 8,986,713; December 31, 2009 - 9,009,296; and March 31, 2009 - 9,216,051)	(448,219		)	(449,360		)	(458,862		)
Total Shareholders’ Equity	939,372			895,973			833,935
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	12,435,670		$	12,414,827		$	11,448,128

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).

Table of Contents

Bank of Hawaii Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity (Unaudited)

									Accum.
									Other
									Compre-
									hensive									Compre-
				Common		Capital			Income			Retained			Treasury			hensive
(dollars in thousands)	Total			Stock		Surplus			(Loss)			Earnings			Stock			Income
Balance as of December 31, 2009	$	895,973		$	569	$	494,318		$	6,925		$	843,521		$	(449,360	)
Comprehensive Income:
Net Income	52,736			—		—			—			52,736			—			$	52,736
Other Comprehensive Income, Net of Tax:
Change in Unrealized Gains and Losses on Investment Securities Available-for-Sale	10,757			—		—			10,757			—			—			10,757
Amortization of Net Losses Related to Defined Benefit Plans	381			—		—			381			—			—			381
Total Comprehensive Income																		$	63,874
Share-Based Compensation	714			—		714			—			—			—
Common Stock Issued under Purchase and Equity Compensation Plans and Related Tax Benefits (52,481 shares)	1,785			1		(379		)	—			(320		)	2,483
Common Stock Repurchased (30,594 shares)	(1,342		)	—		—			—			—			(1,342		)
Cash Dividends Paid	(21,632		)	—		—			—			(21,632		)	—
Balance as of March 31, 2010	$	939,372		$	570	$	494,653		$	18,063		$	874,305		$	(448,219	)

Balance as of December 31, 2008	$	790,704		$	568	$	492,515		$	(28,888	)	$	787,924		$	(461,415	)
Comprehensive Income:
Net Income	36,040			—		—			—			36,040			—			$	36,040
Other Comprehensive Income, Net of Tax:
Change in Unrealized Gains and Losses on Investment Securities Available-for-Sale	27,243			—		—			27,243			—			—			27,243
Amortization of Net Losses Related to Defined Benefit Plans	326			—		—			326			—			—			326
Total Comprehensive Income																		$	63,609
Share-Based Compensation	235			—		235			—			—			—
Common Stock Issued under Purchase and Equity Compensation Plans and Related Tax Benefits (71,244 shares)	1,627			1		(1,398		)	—			(258		)	3,282
Common Stock Repurchased (21,071 shares)	(729		)	—		—			—			—			(729		)
Cash Dividends Paid	(21,511		)	—		—			—			(21,511		)	—
Balance as of March 31, 2009	$	833,935		$	569	$	491,352		$	(1,319	)	$	802,195		$	(458,862	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).

Table of Contents

Bank of Hawaii Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

			Three Months Ended
			March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2010				2009
Operating Activities
Net Income	$	52,736			$	36,040
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities:
Provision for Credit Losses	20,711				24,887
Depreciation and Amortization	3,332				3,399
Amortization of Deferred Loan and Lease Fees	(623			)	(625		)
Amortization and Accretion of Premiums/Discounts on Investment Securities, Net	10,799				1,211
Share-Based Compensation	714				235
Benefit Plan Contributions	(687			)	(421		)
Deferred Income Taxes	(5,780			)	(3,811		)
Net Gains on Investment Securities	(20,021			)	(56		)
Net Change in Trading Securities	—				91,500
Proceeds from Sales of Loans Held for Sale	117,261				398,376
Originations of Loans Held for Sale	(111,860			)	(400,957		)
Tax Benefits from Share-Based Compensation	(10			)	(17		)
Net Change in Other Assets and Other Liabilities	(22,495			)	41,129
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities	44,077				190,890

Investing Activities
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale:
Proceeds from Prepayments and Maturities	351,199				243,329
Proceeds from Sales	483,588				21,791
Purchases	(921,953			)	(810,966		)
Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity:
Proceeds from Prepayments and Maturities	13,865				11,347
Net Change in Loans and Leases	132,316				177,913
Premises and Equipment, Net	(2,666			)	(1,814		)
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities	56,349				(358,400		)

Financing Activities
Net Change in Deposits	84,408				920,693
Net Change in Short-Term Borrowings	(89,253			)	(185,521		)
Repayments of Long-Term Debt	—				(143,971		)
Tax Benefits from Share-Based Compensation	10				17
Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock	2,034				2,069
Repurchase of Common Stock	(1,342			)	(729		)
Cash Dividends Paid	(21,632			)	(21,511		)
Net Cash Provided by (Used In) Financing Activities	(25,775			)	571,047

Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents	74,651				403,537
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period	555,067				796,482
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period	$	629,718			$	1,200,019

Supplemental Information
Cash Paid for Interest	$	15,182			$	29,682
Cash Paid for Income Taxes	37,016				1,390
Non-Cash Investing Activity:
Transfer from Loans to Foreclosed Real Estate	60				—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).

Table of Contents

Bank of Hawaii Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

Bank of Hawaii Corporation (the “Parent”) is a bank holding company headquartered in Honolulu, Hawaii. Bank of Hawaii Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) provide a broad range of financial products and services to customers in Hawaii, Guam, and other Pacific Islands. The Parent’s principal subsidiary is Bank of Hawaii (the “Bank”). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and accompanying notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the consolidated financial statements reflect normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods.

Certain prior period information has been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

These statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. Operating results for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2010.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results may differ from those estimates and such differences could be material to the financial statements.

Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements,” which added disclosure requirements about transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2, clarified existing fair value disclosure requirements about the appropriate level of disaggregation, and clarified that a description of valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value was required for recurring and nonrecurring Level 2 and 3 fair value measurements. The Company adopted these provisions of the ASU in preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ended March 31, 2010. The adoption of these provisions of this ASU, which was subsequently codified into Accounting Standards Codification Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” only affected the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements and as a result had no impact on the Company’s statements of income and condition. See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the disclosures required by this ASU.

This ASU also requires that Level 3 activity about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements be presented on a gross basis rather than as a net number as currently permitted. This provision of the ASU is effective for the Company’s reporting period ending March 31, 2011. As this provision amends only the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements, the adoption will have no impact on the Company’s statements of income and condition.

Table of Contents

Note 2. Investment Securities

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and estimated fair value of the Company’s investment securities as of March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009, and March 31, 2009 were as follows:

			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
(dollars in thousands)	Cost		Gains		Losses			Value
March 31, 2010
Available-for-Sale:
Debt Securities Issued by the U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies	$	746,761	$	7,050	$	(958	)	$	752,853
Debt Securities Issued by States and Political Subdivisions	51,940		1,402		(16		)	53,326
Debt Securities Issued by U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	751		33		—			784
Mortgage-Backed Securities Issued by
Government Agencies	4,265,067		44,846		(6,274		)	4,303,639
U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	321,681		14,956		—			336,637
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities	4,586,748		59,802		(6,274		)	4,640,276
Total	$	5,386,200	$	68,287	$	(7,248	)	$	5,447,239
Held-to-Maturity:
Mortgage-Backed Securities Issued by
Government Agencies	$	55,834	$	2,379	$	—		$	58,213
U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	111,265		4,168		—			115,433
Total	$	167,099	$	6,547	$	—		$	173,646

December 31, 2009
Available-for-Sale:
Debt Securities Issued by the U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies	$	711,223	$	11,248	$	(1,679	)	$	720,792
Debt Securities Issued by States and Political Subdivisions	52,742		1,391		(17		)	54,116
Debt Securities Issued by U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	751		41		—			792
Mortgage-Backed Securities Issued by
Government Agencies	4,015,816		26,900		(20,029		)	4,022,687
U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	509,225		23,276		(54		)	532,447
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities	4,525,041		50,176		(20,083		)	4,555,134
Total	$	5,289,757	$	62,856	$	(21,779	)	$	5,330,834
Held-to-Maturity:
Mortgage-Backed Securities Issued by
Government Agencies	$	59,542	$	1,879	$	—		$	61,421
U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	121,476		3,771		—			125,247
Total	$	181,018	$	5,650	$	—		$	186,668

March 31, 2009
Available-for-Sale:
Debt Securities Issued by the U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies	$	566,606	$	1,898	$	(501	)	$	568,003
Debt Securities Issued by States and Political Subdivisions	50,482		1,196		(68		)	51,610
Debt Securities Issued by U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	145,530		312		—			145,842
Mortgage-Backed Securities Issued by
Government Agencies	590,072		13,448		(1		)	603,519
U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	1,413,795		46,662		(4		)	1,460,453
Private-Label Mortgage-Backed Securities	279,093		54		(27,068		)	252,079
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities	2,282,960		60,164		(27,073		)	2,316,051
Other Debt Securities	25,088		15		(1		)	25,102
Total	$	3,070,666	$	63,585	$	(27,643	)	$	3,106,608
Held-to-Maturity:
Mortgage-Backed Securities Issued by
Government Agencies	$	69,731	$	2,276	$	—		$	72,007
U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	158,446		3,213		(33		)	161,626
Total	$	228,177	$	5,489	$	(33	)	$	233,633

Table of Contents

The table below presents an analysis of the contractual maturities of the Company’s investment securities as of March 31, 2010. Mortgage-backed securities are disclosed separately in the table below as these investment securities may prepay prior to their scheduled contractual maturity dates.

			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized
(dollars in thousands)	Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair Value
Available-for-Sale:
Due in One Year or Less	$	22,304	$	87	$	—		$	22,391
Due After One Year Through Five Years	328,177		930		(283		)	328,824
Due After Five Years Through Ten Years	93,930		992		(14		)	94,908
Due After Ten Years	355,041		6,476		(677		)	360,840
	799,452		8,485		(974		)	806,963
Mortgage-Backed Securities Issued by
Government Agencies	4,265,067		44,846		(6,274		)	4,303,639
U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	321,681		14,956		—			336,637
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities	4,586,748		59,802		(6,274		)	4,640,276
Total	$	5,386,200	$	68,287	$	(7,248	)	$	5,447,239

Held-to-Maturity:
Mortgage-Backed Securities Issued by
Government Agencies	$	55,834	$	2,379	$	—		$	58,213
U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	111,265		4,168		—			115,433
Total	$	167,099	$	6,547	$	—		$	173,646

Investment securities pledged where the secured parties have the right to sell or repledge the investment securities had carrying values of $2.7 billion as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, and $2.3 billion as of March 31, 2009. These investment securities were pledged to secure deposits of governmental entities and securities sold under agreements to repurchase.

Gross gains on the sales of investment securities were $20.0 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Gross losses on the sales of investment securities were not material for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. Realized gains and losses on investment securities were recorded in noninterest income using the specific identification method.

Table of Contents

The Company’s temporarily impaired investment securities as of March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009, and March 31, 2009 were as follows:

	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or Longer					Total
			Gross					Gross					Gross
			Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized
(dollars in thousands)	Fair Value		Losses			Fair Value		Losses			Fair Value		Losses
March 31, 2010
Debt Securities Issued by the U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies	$	205,860	$	(937	)	$	1,627	$	(21	)	$	207,487	$	(958	)
Debt Securities Issued by States and Political Subdivisions	875		(4		)	322		(12		)	1,197		(16		)
Mortgage-Backed Securities Issued by Government Agencies	1,079,640		(6,274		)	—		—			1,079,640		(6,274		)
Total Temporarily Impaired Investment Securities	$	1,286,375	$	(7,215	)	$	1,949	$	(33	)	$	1,288,324	$	(7,248	)

December 31, 2009
Debt Securities Issued by the U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies	$	347,324	$	(1,656	)	$	1,703	$	(23	)	$	349,027	$	(1,679	)
Debt Securities Issued by States and Political Subdivisions	878		(5		)	322		(12		)	1,200		(17		)
Mortgage-Backed Securities Issued by Government Agencies	2,171,588		(20,029		)	—		—			2,171,588		(20,029		)
U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	8,982		(54		)	—		—			8,982		(54		)
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities	2,180,570		(20,083		)	—		—			2,180,570		(20,083		)
Total Temporarily Impaired Investment Securities	$	2,528,772	$	(21,744	)	$	2,025	$	(35	)	$	2,530,797	$	(21,779	)

March 31, 2009
Debt Securities Issued by the U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies	$	226,503	$	(454	)	$	1,847	$	(47	)	$	228,350	$	(501	)
Debt Securities Issued by States and Political Subdivisions	3,603		(48		)	314		(20		)	3,917		(68		)
Mortgage-Backed Securities Issued by Government Agencies	7,948		(1		)	—		—			7,948		(1		)
U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	22,306		(37		)	—		—			22,306		(37		)
Private-Label Mortgage-Backed Securities	5,360		(1,873		)	235,859		(25,195		)	241,219		(27,068		)
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities	35,614		(1,911		)	235,859		(25,195		)	271,473		(27,106		)
Other Debt Securities	—		—			34		(1		)	34		(1		)
Total Temporarily Impaired Investment Securities	$	265,720	$	(2,413	)	$	238,054	$	(25,263	)	$	503,774	$	(27,676	)

The Company does not believe that the investment securities that were in an unrealized loss position as of March 31, 2010, which were comprised of 69 securities, represent an other-than-temporary impairment. Total gross unrealized losses were primarily attributable to changes in interest rates, relative to when the investment securities were purchased, and not due to the credit quality of the investment securities. The Company does not intend to sell the investment securities that were in an unrealized loss position and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investment securities before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be at maturity.

As of March 31, 2010, the gross unrealized losses reported for mortgage-backed securities relate to investment securities issued by the Government National Mortgage Association.

Table of Contents

Note 3. Mortgage Servicing Rights

The Company’s portfolio of residential mortgage loans serviced for third parties was $3.1 billion as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, and $2.9 billion as of March 31, 2009. All of the Company’s residential mortgage loans sold to third parties is sold on a non-recourse basis. The Company’s mortgage servicing activities include collecting principal, interest, and escrow payments from borrowers; making tax and insurance payments on behalf of the borrowers; monitoring delinquencies and executing foreclosure proceedings; and accounting for and remitting principal and interest payments to investors. Servicing income, including late and ancillary fees, was $1.8 million and $1.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Servicing income is recorded as a component of mortgage banking income in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. The Company’s residential mortgage loan servicing portfolio is comprised primarily of fixed rate loans concentrated in Hawaii.

For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the change in the fair value of the Company’s mortgage servicing rights accounted for under the fair value measurement method was as follows:

			Three Months Ended
			March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2010				2009
Balance at Beginning of Period	$	15,332			$	19,553
Changes in Fair Value:
Due to Change in Valuation Assumptions 1	(93			)	(91		)
Due to Paydowns and Other 2	(432			)	(1,558		)
Total Changes in Fair Value of Mortgage Servicing Rights	(525			)	(1,649		)
Balance at End of Period	$	14,807			$	17,904

1 Principally represents changes in discount rates and loan repayment rate assumptions, mostly due to changes in interest rates.

2 Principally represents changes due to loan payoffs.

The Company established a new class of mortgage servicing rights, to be accounted for under the amortization method, beginning with servicing rights recognized on or after July 1, 2008. For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the change in the carrying value of the Company’s mortgage servicing rights accounted for under the amortization method, net of a valuation allowance, was as follows:

			Three Months Ended
			March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2010				2009
Balance at Beginning of Period	$	10,638			$	1,796
Servicing Rights that Resulted From Asset Transfers	945				3,923
Amortization	(308			)	(95		)
Balance at End of Period	$	11,275			$	5,624
Valuation Allowance:
Balance at Beginning of Period	$	—			$	292
Recoveries	—				(292		)
Balance at End of Period	$	—			$	—
Mortgage Servicing Rights Accounted for Under the Amortization Method, Net of a Valuation Allowance	$	11,275			$	5,624
Fair Value of Mortgage Servicing Rights Accounted for Under the Amortization Method
Beginning of Period	$	14,853			$	1,504
End of Period	$	16,453			$	6,158

The key assumptions used in estimating the fair value of the Company’s mortgage servicing rights as of March 31, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:

		March 31,
	2010		2009
Weighted-Average Constant Prepayment Rate 1	13.99%		16.85%
Weighted-Average Life (in years)	5.75		4.55
Weighted-Average Note Rate	5.23%		5.54%
Weighted-Average Discount Rate 2	7.24%		6.44%

1 Represents annualized loan repayment rate assumption.

2 Derived from multiple interest rate scenarios that incorporate a spread to the London Interbank Offered Rate swap curve and market volatilities.

Table of Contents

A sensitivity analysis of the Company’s fair value of mortgage servicing rights to changes in certain key assumptions as of March 31, 2010 and 2009 is presented in the following table.

			March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2010				2009
Constant Prepayment Rate
Decrease in fair value from 25 basis points (“bps”) adverse change	$	(385		)	$	(259	)
Decrease in fair value from 50 bps adverse change	(709			)	(517		)
Discount Rate
Decrease in fair value from 25 bps adverse change	(402			)	(280		)
Decrease in fair value from 50 bps adverse change	(795			)	(558		)

This analysis generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of a change in one key assumption to the change in the fair value of the Company’s mortgage servicing rights usually is not linear. Also, the effect of changing one key assumption without changing other assumptions is not realistic.

Note 4. Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase

The Company enters into agreements under which it sells securities subject to an obligation to repurchase the same or similar securities. Under these arrangements, the Company may transfer legal control over the assets but still retain effective control through an agreement that both entitles and obligates the Company to repurchase the assets. As a result, securities sold under agreements to repurchase are accounted for as collateralized financing arrangements and not as a sale and subsequent repurchase of securities. The obligation to repurchase the securities is reflected as a liability in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Condition, while the securities underlying the securities sold under agreements to repurchase remain in the respective asset accounts and are delivered to and held in collateral by third party trustees. The Company has not entered into agreements in which the securities sold and the related liability was not recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Condition.

As of March 31, 2010, the contractual maturities of the Company’s securities sold under agreements to repurchase were as follows:

(dollars in thousands)	Amount
Overnight	$	7,000
2 to 30 Days	658,247
31 to 90 Days	148,189
Over 90 Days	715,611
Total	$	1,529,047

Note 5. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following table presents the change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:

(dollars in thousands)	Before Tax Amount			Tax Effect			Net of Tax
March 31, 2010:
Net Unrealized Gains on Investment Securities
Available-for-Sale Arising During the Year	$	39,983		$	18,436		$	21,547
Reclassification of Net Gains on Investment Securities
Available-for-Sale Included in Net Income	(20,021		)	(9,231		)	(10,790		)
Change in Unrealized Gains and Losses on
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale	19,962			9,205			10,757
Amortization of Net Losses Related to Defined Benefit Plans	595			214			381
Change in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)	$	20,557		$	9,419		$	11,138

March 31, 2009:
Net Unrealized Gains on Investment Securities
Available-for-Sale Arising During the Year	$	42,679		$	15,399		$	27,280
Reclassification of Net Gains on Investment Securities
Available-for-Sale Included in Net Income	(56		)	(19		)	(37		)
Change in Unrealized Gains and Losses on
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale	42,623			15,380			27,243
Amortization of Net Losses Related to Defined Benefit Plans	509			183			326
Change in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)	$	43,132		$	15,563		$	27,569

Table of Contents

Note 6. Earnings Per Share

There were no adjustments to net income, the numerator, for purposes of computing basic earnings per share. The following is a reconciliation of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for computing diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2010	2009
Denominator for Basic Earnings Per Share	47,914,412	47,566,005
Dilutive Effect of Stock Options	325,630	208,569
Dilutive Effect of Restricted Stock	49,385	27,675
Denominator for Diluted Earnings Per Share	48,289,427	47,802,249

For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, 233,924 and 472,572 shares of stock options and restricted stock, respectively, were outstanding but not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share as they were antidilutive.

Note 7. Business Segments

The Company’s business segments are defined as Retail Banking, Commercial Banking, Investment Services, and Treasury. The Company’s internal management accounting process measures the performance of the business segments based on the management structure of the Company. This process, which is not necessarily comparable with similar information for any other financial institution, uses various techniques to assign balance sheet and income statement amounts to the business segments, including allocations of income, expense, the provision for credit losses, and capital. This process is dynamic and requires certain allocations based on judgment and other subjective factors. Unlike financial accounting, there is no comprehensive authoritative guidance for management accounting that is equivalent to GAAP.

The net interest income of the business segments reflects the results of a funds transfer pricing process that matches assets and liabilities with similar interest rate sensitivity and maturity characteristics and reflects the allocation of net interest income related to the Company’s overall asset and liability management activities on a proportionate basis. The basis for the allocation of net interest income is a function of the Company’s assumptions that are subject to change based on changes in current interest rates and market conditions. Funds transfer pricing also serves to transfer interest rate risk to Treasury. However, the other business segments have some latitude to retain certain interest rate exposures related to customer pricing decisions within guidelines.

Retail Banking

Retail Banking offers a broad range of financial products and services to consumers and small businesses. Loan and lease products include residential mortgage loans, home equity lines of credit, automobile loans and leases, and installment loans. Deposit products include checking, savings, and time deposit accounts. Retail Banking also offers retail life insurance products and provides merchant services to its small business customers. Products and services from Retail Banking are delivered to customers through 71 Hawaii branch locations, 483 ATMs throughout Hawaii and the Pacific Islands, e-Bankoh (on-line banking service), a 24-hour customer service center, and a mobile banking service.

Commercial Banking

Commercial Banking offers products including corporate banking, commercial real estate loans, commercial lease financing, auto dealer financing, and deposit and cash management products. Commercial lending, deposit, and cash management services are offered to middle-market and large companies in Hawaii. Commercial real estate mortgages focus on customers that include investors, developers, and builders domiciled in Hawaii. Commercial Banking also includes syndicated lending activities, international banking, and operations at the Bank’s 12 branches in the Pacific Islands.

Table of Contents

Investment Services

Investment Services includes private banking, trust services, asset management, and institutional investment advisory services. A significant portion of this segment’s income is derived from fees, which are generally based on the market values of assets under management. The private banking and personal trust group assists individuals and families in building and preserving their wealth by providing investment, credit, and trust services to high-net-worth individuals. The asset management group manages portfolios and creates investment products. Institutional sales and service offers investment advice to corporations, government entities, and foundations. This segment also provides a full service brokerage offering equities, mutual funds, life insurance, and annuity products.

Treasury

Treasury consists of corporate asset and liability management activities, including interest rate risk management and a foreign exchange business. This segment’s assets and liabilities (and related interest income and expense) consist of interest-bearing deposits, investment securities, federal funds sold and purchased, government deposits, and short- and long-term borrowings. The primary sources of noninterest income are from bank-owned life insurance and foreign exchange income related to customer driven currency requests from merchants and island visitors. The net residual effect of the transfer pricing of assets and liabilities is included in Treasury, along with the elimination of intercompany transactions.

Other organizational units (Technology, Operations, Marketing, Human Resources, Finance, Credit and Risk Management, and Corporate and Regulatory Administration) included in Treasury provide a wide-range of support to the Company’s other income earning segments. Expenses incurred by these support units are charged to the business segments through an internal cost allocation process.

Selected business segment financial information as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:

	Retail			Commercial			Investment			Treasury and			Consolidated
(dollars in thousands)	Banking			Banking			Services			Other			Total
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
Net Interest Income	$	49,623		$	40,838		$	4,323		$	12,869		$	107,653
Provision for Credit Losses	15,356			5,141			215			(1		)	20,711
Net Interest Income After Provision for Credit Losses	34,267			35,697			4,108			12,870			86,942
Noninterest Income	23,466			10,019			15,027			23,270			71,782
Noninterest Expense	(42,333		)	(23,862		)	(14,045		)	(1,466		)	(81,706		)
Income Before Provision for Income Taxes	15,400			21,854			5,090			34,674			77,018
Provision for Income Taxes	(5,698		)	(7,892		)	(1,884		)	(8,808		)	(24,282		)
Net Income	9,702			13,962			3,206			25,866			52,736
Total Assets as of March 31, 2010	$	3,226,303		$	2,420,063		$	298,103		$	6,491,201		$	12,435,670

Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
Net Interest Income (Loss)	$	55,803		$	39,188		$	3,992		$	(1,921	)	$	97,062
Provision for Credit Losses	16,567			7,758			804			(242		)	24,887
Net Interest Income (Loss) After Provision for Credit Losses	39,236			31,430			3,188			(1,679		)	72,175
Noninterest Income	27,982			24,259			14,443			3,681			70,365
Noninterest Expense	(43,426		)	(26,208		)	(16,559		)	(1,740		)	(87,933		)
Income Before Provision for Income Taxes	23,792			29,481			1,072			262			54,607
Provision for Income Taxes	(8,805		)	(10,886		)	(396		)	1,520			(18,567		)
Net Income	14,987			18,595			676			1,782			36,040
Total Assets as of March 31, 2009	$	3,720,576		$	2,697,807		$	256,962		$	4,772,783		$	11,448,128

Table of Contents

Note 8. Pension Plans and Postretirement Benefit Plan

The components of net periodic benefit cost for the Company’s pension plans and the postretirement benefit plan for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:

	Pension Benefits						Postretirement Benefits
	Three Months Ended March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2010			2009			2010			2009
Service Cost	$	—		$	—		$	117		$	109
Interest Cost	1,294			1,285			439			419
Expected Return on Plan Assets	(1,642		)	(1,332		)	—			—
Amortization of:
Prior Service Credit	—			—			(53		)	(53		)
Net Actuarial Losses (Gains)	724			732			(76		)	(119		)
Net Periodic Benefit Cost	$	376		$	685		$	427		$	356

The net periodic benefit cost for the Company’s pension plans and postretirement benefit plan are recorded as a component of salaries and benefits in the Consolidated Statements of Income. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company contributed $0.6 million to the pension plans and $0.1 million to the postretirement benefit plan. The Company expects to contribute $3.0 million to the pension plans and $1.4 million to the postretirement benefit plan for the year ending December 31, 2010.

Note 9. Derivative Financial Instruments

The following table presents the Company’s derivative financial instruments, their estimated fair values, and balance sheet location as of March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009, and March 31, 2009:

	As of March 31, 2010				As of December 31, 2009				As of March 31, 2009
Derivative Financial Instruments Not Designated as Hedging Instruments1 (dollars in thousands)	Asset Derivatives		Liability Derivatives		Asset Derivatives		Liability Derivatives		Asset Derivatives		Liability Derivatives
Forward Commitments	$	322	$	12	$	1,123	$	5	$	96	$	770
Interest Rate Lock Commitments	598		82		564		580		2,978		13
Interest Rate Swap Agreements	21,106		21,285		18,834		18,998		31,152		31,372
Foreign Exchange Contracts	36		391		175		402		339		1,468
Total	$	22,062	$	21,770	$	20,696	$	19,985	$	34,565	$	33,623

1 Asset derivatives are included in other assets and liability derivatives are included in other liabilities in the Consolidated Statements of Condition.

The following table presents the Company’s derivative financial instruments and the amount and location of the net gains and losses recognized in the statements of income for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:

Derivative Financial Instruments Not Designated	Location of Net Gains (Losses)	Three Months Ended March 31,
as Hedging Instruments (dollars in thousands)	Recognized in the Statements of Income	2010			2009
Forward Commitments	Mortgage Banking	$	(319	)	$	587
Interest Rate Lock Commitments	Mortgage Banking	2,359			6,925
Interest Rate Swap Agreements	Other Noninterest Income	154			142
Foreign Exchange Contracts	Other Noninterest Income	746			598
Total		$	2,940		$	8,252

Table of Contents

Management has received authorization from the Bank’s Board of Directors to use derivative financial instruments as an end-user in connection with its risk management activities and to accommodate the needs of its customers. Derivative financial instruments are required to be carried at its estimated fair value on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Condition. As of March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009, and March 31, 2009, the Company did not designate any derivative financial instruments as fair value, cash flow, or net investment in foreign operations hedges. The Company’s free-standing derivative financial instruments have been recorded at fair value on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Condition.

The Company is a party to derivative financial instruments in the normal course of its business to meet the financing needs of its customers and to manage its own exposure to fluctuations in interest and foreign exchange rates. Where derivative financial instruments have been entered into to facilitate the risk management activities of our customers, the Company generally enters into transactions with dealers to offset its risk exposure. These financial instruments have been limited to forward commitments, interest rate lock commitments, interest rate swap agreements, and foreign exchange contracts.

The Company enters into forward commitments for the future delivery of residential mortgage loans to reduce interest rate risk associated with loans held for sale and interest rate lock commitments to fund loans at specified interest rates. The forward commitments and interest rate lock commitments are free-standing derivatives which are carried at estimated fair value with changes recorded in the mortgage banking component of noninterest income. Changes in the estimated fair value of forward commitments and interest rate lock commitments subsequent to inception are based on changes in the fair value of the underlying loan resulting from the fulfillment of the commitment and changes in the probability that the loan will fund within the terms of the commitment, which is affected primarily by changes in interest rates and the passage of time.

All of the Company’s interest rate swap agreements were to facilitate the risk management strategies of a small number of commercial banking customers. The Company mitigates this risk by entering into equal and offsetting interest rate swap agreements with highly rated third parties. Changes in the estimated fair value of the Company’s interest rate swap agreements are included in other noninterest income in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.

The Company utilizes foreign exchange contracts to offset risks related to transactions executed on behalf of customers. Changes in the estimated fair value of the Company’s foreign exchange contracts are included in other noninterest income in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.

As with any financial instrument, derivative financial instruments have inherent risks. Adverse changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and equity prices affect the Company’s market risks. The market risks are balanced with the expected returns to enhance earnings performance and shareholder value, while limiting the volatility of each. The Company uses various processes to monitor its overall market risk exposure, including sensitivity analysis, value-at-risk calculations, and other methodologies.

The Company’s exposure to derivative credit risk is defined as the possibility of sustaining a loss due to the failure of the counterparty to perform in accordance with the terms of the contract. Credit risks associated with derivative financial instruments are similar to those relating to traditional on-balance sheet financial instruments. The Company manages derivative credit risk with the same standards and procedures applied to its commercial lending activities.

Table of Contents

Note 10. Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities

Fair Value Hierarchy

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for an asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. GAAP established a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the use of inputs used in valuation methodologies into the following three levels:

Level 1: Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices, unadjusted, for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. A quoted price in an active market provides the most reliable evidence of fair value and shall be used to measure fair value whenever available.

Level 2: Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; or inputs to the valuation methodology that are derived principally from or can be corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

Level 3: Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using discounted cash flow methodologies, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.

An asset or liability’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Management reviews and updates the fair value hierarchy classifications of the Company’s assets and liabilities on a quarterly basis.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

Investment Securities Available-for-Sale

Fair values of investment securities available-for-sale were primarily measured using information from a third-party pricing service. This pricing service provides pricing information by utilizing evaluated pricing models supported with market data information. Standard inputs include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers, and reference data from market research publications. If quoted prices were available in an active market, investment securities were classified as Level 1 measurements. Level 1 investment securities included debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury. If quoted prices in active markets were not available, fair values were estimated primarily by the use of pricing models. Level 2 investment securities were primarily comprised of mortgage-backed securities issued by government agencies and U.S. government-sponsored enterprises. In certain cases where there were limited or less transparent information provided by the Company’s third-party pricing service, fair value was estimated by the use of secondary pricing services or through the use of non-binding third-party broker quotes.

On a quarterly basis, management reviews the pricing information received from the Company’s third-party pricing service. This review process includes a comparison to non-binding third-party broker quotes, as well as a review of market-related conditions impacting the information provided by the Company’s third-party pricing service.

Management primarily identifies investment securities which may have traded in illiquid or inactive markets by identifying instances of a significant decrease in the volume and frequency of trades, relative to historical levels, as well as instances of a significant widening of the bid-ask spread in the brokered markets. Investment securities that are deemed to have been trading in illiquid or inactive markets may require the use of significant unobservable inputs. For example, management may use quoted prices for similar investment securities in the absence of a liquid and active market for the investment securities being valued. As of March 31, 2010, management did not make adjustments to prices provided by the third-party pricing service as a result of illiquid or inactive markets.

Table of Contents

Mortgage Servicing Rights

Mortgage servicing rights do not trade in an active market with readily observable market data. As a result, the Company estimates the fair value of mortgage servicing rights by using a discounted cash flow model to calculate the present value of estimated future net servicing income. The assumptions used in the discounted cash flow model are those that we believe market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income, including estimates of loan prepayment rates, servicing costs, ancillary income, impound account balances, and discount rates. Significant assumptions in the valuation of mortgage servicing rights include changes in interest rates, estimated loan repayment rates, and the timing of cash flows, among other factors. Mortgage servicing rights are classified as Level 3 measurements due to the use of significant unobservable inputs and management judgment and estimation.

Other Assets

Other assets recorded at fair value on a recurring basis are primarily comprised of investments related to deferred compensation arrangements. Quoted prices for these investments, primarily in mutual funds, are available in active markets. Thus, the Company’s investments related to deferred compensation arrangements are classified as Level 1 measurements in the fair value hierarchy.

Derivative Financial Instruments

Derivative financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis are comprised of forward commitments, interest rate lock commitments, interest rate swap agreements, and foreign exchange contracts. The fair values of forward commitments are deemed Level 2 measurements as they are primarily based on quoted prices from the secondary market based on the settlement date of the contracts, interpolated or extrapolated, if necessary, to estimate a fair value as of the end of the reporting period. The fair values of interest rate lock commitments are calculated using a discounted cash flow approach utilizing inputs such as the fall-out ratio. The fall-out ratio is derived from the Bank’s internal data and is adjusted using significant management judgment as to the percentage of loans which are currently in a lock position which will ultimately not close. The fair values of interest rate swap agreements are also calculated using a discounted cash flow approach and utilize inputs such as the London Inter Bank Offered Rate swap curve, effective date, maturity date, notional amount, and stated interest rate. Interest rate lock commitments and interest rate swap agreements are deemed Level 3 measurements as significant unobservable inputs and management judgment is required. The fair values of foreign exchange contracts are calculated using the Bank’s multi-currency accounting system which utilizes contract specific information such as currency, maturity date, contractual amount, and strike price, along with market data information such as spot rates of the specific currency and yield curves. Foreign exchange contracts are deemed Level 2 measurements because while they are valued using the Bank’s multi-currency accounting system, significant management judgment or estimation is not required.

The Company is exposed to credit risk if the counterparties fail to perform. The Company seeks to minimize credit risk through credit approvals, limits, monitoring procedures, and collateral requirements. The Company generally enters into transactions with counterparties that carry high quality credit ratings. Credit risk associated with the counterparties as well as the Company’s non-performance risk is factored into the determination of the estimated fair value of the derivative financial instruments.

Table of Contents

The table below presents the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009, and March 31, 2009:

	Quoted Prices in		Significant
	Active Markets for		Other			Significant
	Identical Assets		Observable			Unobservable
	or Liabilities		Inputs			Inputs
(dollars in thousands)	(Level 1)		(Level 2)			(Level 3)			Total
March 31, 2010
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale
Debt Securities Issued by the U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies	$	750,556	$	2,297		$	—		$	752,853
Debt Securities Issued by States and Political Subdivisions	—		53,326			—			53,326
Debt Securities Issued by U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	—		784			—			784
Mortgage-Backed Securities Issued by
Government Agencies	—		4,303,639			—			4,303,639
U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	—		336,637			—			336,637
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities	—		4,640,276			—			4,640,276
Total Investment Securities Available-for-Sale	750,556		4,696,683			—			5,447,239
Mortgage Servicing Rights	—		—			14,807			14,807
Other Assets	10,033		—			—			10,033
Net Derivative Assets and Liabilities	—		(45		)	337			292
Total Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis as of March 31, 2010	$	760,589	$	4,696,638		$	15,144		$	5,472,371

December 31, 2009
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale
Debt Securities Issued by the U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies	$	718,388	$	2,404		$	—		$	720,792
Debt Securities Issued by States and Political Subdivisions	—		54,116			—			54,116
Debt Securities Issued by U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	—		792			—			792
Mortgage-Backed Securities Issued by
Government Agencies	—		4,022,687			—			4,022,687
U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	—		532,447			—			532,447
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities	—		4,555,134			—			4,555,134
Total Investment Securities Available-for-Sale	718,388		4,612,446			—			5,330,834
Mortgage Servicing Rights	—		—			15,332			15,332
Other Assets	8,979		—			—			8,979
Net Derivative Assets and Liabilities	—		891			(180		)	711
Total Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis as of December 31, 2009	$	727,367	$	4,613,337		$	15,152		$	5,355,856

March 31, 2009
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale
Debt Securities Issued by the U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies	$	565,131	$	2,872		$	—		$	568,003
Debt Securities Issued by States and Political Subdivisions	—		51,610			—			51,610
Debt Securities Issued by U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	—		145,842			—			145,842
Mortgage-Backed Securities Issued by
Government Agencies	—		603,519			—			603,519
U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	—		1,460,453			—			1,460,453
Private-Label Mortgage-Backed Securities	—		252,079			—			252,079
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities	—		2,316,051			—			2,316,051
Other Debt Securities	—		25,102			—			25,102
Total Investment Securities Available-for-Sale	565,131		2,541,477			—			3,106,608
Mortgage Servicing Rights	—		—			17,904			17,904
Other Assets	6,343		—			—			6,343
Net Derivative Assets and Liabilities	—		(1,803		)	2,745			942
Total Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis as of March 31, 2009	$	571,474	$	2,539,674		$	20,649		$	3,131,797

Table of Contents

For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:

				Mortgage			Net Derivative
				Servicing			Assets and
Assets (dollars in thousands)				Rights 1			Liabilities 2			Total
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
Balance as of January 1, 2010				$	15,332		$	(180	)	$	15,152
Realized and Unrealized Net Gains (Losses):
Included in Net Income				(525		)	2,513			1,988
Purchases, Sales, Issuances, and Settlements, Net				—			(1,996		)	(1,996		)
Balance as of March 31, 2010				$	14,807		$	337		$	15,144

Total Unrealized Net Gains (Losses) Included in Net Income Related to Assets Still Held as of March 31, 2010				$	(93	)	$	337		$	244

	Investment			Mortgage			Net Derivative
	Securities			Servicing			Assets and
Assets (dollars in thousands)	Available-for-Sale 3			Rights 1			Liabilities 2			Total
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
Balance as of January 1, 2009	$	55,715		$	19,553		$	3,051		$	78,319
Realized and Unrealized Net Gains (Losses):
Included in Net Income	—			(1,649		)	7,067			5,418
Purchases, Sales, Issuances, and Settlements, Net	(55,715		)	—			(7,373		)	(63,088		)
Balance as of March 31, 2009	$	—		$	17,904		$	2,745		$	20,649

Total Unrealized Net Gains (Losses) Included in Net Income Related to Assets Still Held as of March 31, 2009	$	—		$	(92	)	$	2,745		$	2,653

Liabilities (dollars in thousands)	Long-Term Debt 4			Total
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
Balance as of January 1, 2009	$	119,275		$	119,275
Unrealized Net Gains Included in Net Income	(304		)	(304		)
Purchases, Sales, Issuances, and Settlements, Net	(118,971		)	(118,971		)
Balance as of March 31, 2009	$	—		$	—

1 Realized and unrealized gains and losses related to mortgage servicing rights are reported as a component of mortgage banking income in the Company’s consolidated statements of income.

2 Realized and unrealized gains and losses related to interest rate lock commitments are reported as a component of mortgage banking income in the Company’s consolidated statements of income. Realized and unrealized gains and losses related to interest rate swap agreements are recorded as a component of other noninterest income in the Company’s consolidated statements of income.

3 Unrealized gains and losses related to investment securities available-for-sale are reported as a component of other comprehensive income in the Company’s consolidated statements of condition.

4 Realized and unrealized gains and losses related to long-term debt were reported as a component of other noninterest income in the Company’s consolidated statements of income.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

The Company may be required periodically to measure certain assets and liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. These adjustments to fair value usually result from the application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or impairment write-downs of individual assets. As of March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009, and March 31, 2009, there were no adjustments to fair value for the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP.

Table of Contents

Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments

These disclosures exclude financial instruments that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Condition as well as short-term financial assets such as cash and cash equivalents, and liabilities such as short-term borrowings, for which the carrying amounts approximate fair value. The assumptions used below are expected to approximate those that market participants would use in valuing these financial instruments.

Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity

The fair value of the Company’s investment securities held-to-maturity was primarily measured using information from a third-party pricing service. Quoted prices in active markets were used whenever available. If quoted prices were not available, estimated fair values were measured using pricing models or other valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for credit loss assumptions.

Loans Held for Sale

The estimated fair value of the Company’s residential mortgage loans held for sale was determined based on quoted prices for similar loans in active markets. The estimated fair value of the Company’s commercial loans held for sale was determined based on quoted prices for similar loans in active markets or agreed upon sales prices.

Loans

The estimated fair value of the Company’s loans was determined by discounting the expected future cash flows of pools of loans with similar characteristics. Loans were first segregated by type such as commercial, real estate, and consumer, and were then further segmented into fixed and variable rate and loan quality categories. Expected future cash flows were projected based on contractual cash flows, adjusted for estimated prepayments.

Deposit Liabilities

The estimated fair values of the Company’s noninterest-bearing and interest-bearing demand deposits and savings deposits were equal to the amount payable on demand (i.e., their carrying amounts) because these products have no stated maturity. The estimated fair values of the Company’s time deposits were estimated using discounted cash flow analyses. The discount rates used were based on rates currently offered for deposits with similar remaining maturities.

Long-Term Debt

The estimated fair values of the Company’s long-term debt were calculated using a discounted cash flow approach and applying discount rates currently offered for new notes with similar remaining maturities and considering the Company’s non-performance risk.

The following presents the carrying amount and fair values of the Company’s financial instruments as of March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009, and March 31, 2009:

			March 31, 2010					December 31, 2009					March 31, 2009
(dollars in thousands)	Carrying Amount			Fair Value		Carrying Amount			Fair Value		Carrying Amount			Fair Value
Financial Instruments - Assets
Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity	$	167,099		$	173,646	$	181,018		$	186,668	$	228,177		$	233,633
Loans Held for Sale	11,143			11,124		16,544			16,552		24,121			24,189
Loans 1	5,074,571			5,332,043		5,217,472			5,443,649		5,780,140			5,794,067
Financial Instruments - Liabilities
Deposits	9,494,084			9,506,092		9,409,676			9,421,423		9,212,791			9,229,447
Long-Term Debt 2	81,338			81,429		81,338			83,265		50,000			50,252

1 Comprised of loans, net of unearned income and the allowance for loan losses.

2 Excludes capitalized lease obligations.

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains forward-looking statements concerning, among other things, the economic and business environment in our service area and elsewhere, credit quality, our contributions to the Company’s pension plans and the postretirement benefit plan, and other financial and business matters in future periods. Our forward-looking statements are based on numerous assumptions, any of which could prove to be inaccurate and actual results may differ materially from those projected because of a variety of risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to: 1) general economic conditions either nationally, internationally, or locally may be different than expected; 2) unanticipated changes in the securities markets, public debt markets, and other capital markets in the U.S. and globally; 3) the effect of the increase in government intervention in the U.S. financial system; 4) competitive pressure among financial services and products; 5) the impact of legislation and changes in the regulatory environment; 6) changes in fiscal and monetary policies of the markets in which we operate; 7) actual or alleged conduct which could harm our reputation; 8) changes in accounting standards; 9) changes in tax laws or regulations or the interpretation of such laws and regulations; 10) changes in our credit quality or risk profile that may increase or decrease the required level of our reserve for credit losses; 11) changes in market interest rates that may affect credit markets and our ability to maintain our net interest margin; 12) unpredicted costs and other consequences of legal or regulatory matters involving the Company; 13) resumption of common stock repurchases; and 14) geopolitical risk, military or terrorist activity, natural disasters, or adverse weather, public health, and other conditions impacting us and our customers’ operations. For a detailed discussion of these and other risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from such forward-looking statements, refer to the section entitled “Risk Factors” in Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, and subsequent periodic and current reports, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Words such as “appears,” “may,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “targeted,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but are not exclusive means of identifying such statements. We do not undertake an obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect later events or circumstances.

Reclassifications

Certain prior period information in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) has been reclassified to conform to current period classifications.

Overview

Bank of Hawaii Corporation (the “Parent”) is a bank holding company headquartered in Honolulu, Hawaii. The Parent’s principal and only operating subsidiary is Bank of Hawaii (the “Bank”).

The Bank, directly and through its subsidiaries, provides a broad range of financial services to businesses, consumers, and governments in Hawaii, Guam, and other Pacific Islands. References to “we,” “our,” “us,” or the “Company” refer to the holding company and its subsidiaries that are consolidated for financial reporting purposes.

Our vision is “exceptional people building exceptional value for our customers, our island communities, our shareholders, and each other.” “Maximizing shareholder value over time” remains our governing objective.

In striving to achieve our vision and governing objective, our business plan is balanced between growth and risk management, including the flexibility to adjust, given the uncertainties in the current economy. We remain concerned about increases in interest rates, inflation, and the unintended consequences of increased government intervention. In 2010, we intend to continue to focus on asset quality, reserve and capital levels, and liquidity, as well as opportunities to further serve our customers.

Hawaii Economy

The first quarter of 2010 reflects general stability in Hawaii’s economy. Visitor arrivals improved slightly and spending, while still weak, showed signs of stabilization. Some sectors are beginning to add modest numbers of jobs, although additional public sector job losses remain a risk. Hawaii’s seasonally-adjusted unemployment rate was 6.9% at the end of February 2010 compared to the national rate of 9.7%. Home sales on Oahu continue to improve and prices have stabilized, although sales on Hawaiian islands other than Oahu continue to lag. Private construction activity appears to be at a low and the sector may begin to see more benefit from Federal and State spending programs.

Table of Contents

Financial Highlights

For the first quarter of 2010, net income was $52.7 million, an increase of $16.7 million or 46% compared to the first quarter of 2009. Diluted earnings per share were $1.09 per share, an increase of $0.34 per share from the first quarter of 2009. Our higher net income for the first quarter of 2010 was primarily due to the following:

· Net interest income increased by $10.6 million in the first quarter of 2010, reflecting lower funding costs. Also contributing to the increase in net interest income was $2.8 million in interest recoveries recorded in the first quarter of 2010.

· Net gains from the sale of investment securities increased by $20.0 million in the first quarter of 2010.

· Noninterest expense decreased by $6.2 million in the first quarter of 2010, reflecting lower levels of salaries and benefits, legal claims and contingencies, and operational losses.

· The provision for credit losses (the “Provision”) decreased by $4.2 million in the first quarter of 2010.

The impact of these items were partially offset by a $5.2 million decrease in mortgage banking income as a result of lower origination volume, as well as the gains from the sale of our equity interest in two watercraft leveraged leases in the first quarter of 2009. We recorded pre-tax gains of $10.0 million and after-tax gains of $6.2 million as a result of the sale of our equity interest in these leveraged leases.

A more detailed discussion of the changes in the various components of net income is presented in the following sections of MD&A.

We continued to strengthen our balance sheet in the first quarter of 2010 with increased funding, reserves for credit losses, liquidity, and capital.

· Total deposits were $9.5 billion as of March 31, 2010, an increase of $84.4 million or 1% from December 31, 2009, and an increase of $281.3 million or 3% from March 31, 2009.

· Our Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses (the “Allowance”) was $146.4 million as of March 31, 2010, an increase of $2.7 million or 2% from December 31, 2009, and an increase of $11.9 million or 9% from March 31, 2009. The ratio of our Allowance to total loans and leases outstanding increased to 2.61% as of March 31, 2010, compared to 2.49% as of December 31, 2009, and 2.12% as of March 31, 2009.

· Non-performing assets were $41.6 million as of March 31, 2010, a decrease of $6.7 million or 14% from December 31, 2009.

· We continued to invest excess liquidity conservatively in mortgage-backed securities issued by the Government National Mortgage Association, as well as U.S. Treasury Notes, Bonds, and Inflation-Protected Securities.

· We continued to increase our capital levels during the first quarter of 2010. Shareholders’ equity was $939.4 million as of March 31, 2010, an increase of $43.4 million or 5% from December 31, 2009, and an increase of $105.4 million or 13% from March 31, 2009.

· Our Tier 1 capital ratio was 15.93% as of March 31, 2010, compared to 14.84% as of December 31, 2009, and 11.98% as of March 31, 2009. Our ratio of tangible common equity to risk-weighted assets was 16.75% as of March 31, 2010, compared to 15.45% as of December 31, 2009, and 12.47% as of March 31, 2009.

Table of Contents

Table 1 presents our financial highlights for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 and as of March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009, and March 31, 2009.

Financial Highlights								Table 1
						Three Months Ended
						March 31,
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)				2010				2009
For the Period:
Operating Results
Net Interest Income				$	107,653			$	97,062
Provision for Credit Losses				20,711				24,887
Total Noninterest Income				71,782				70,365
Total Noninterest Expense				81,706				87,933
Net Income				52,736				36,040
Basic Earnings Per Share				1.10				0.76
Diluted Earnings Per Share				1.09				0.75
Dividends Declared Per Share				0.45				0.45

Performance Ratios
Return on Average Assets				1.73			%	1.32		%
Return on Average Shareholders’ Equity				22.54				17.86
Efficiency Ratio 1				45.54				52.52
Operating Leverage 2				1.99				2.41
Net Interest Margin 3				3.72				3.76
Dividend Payout Ratio 4				40.91				59.21
Average Shareholders’ Equity to Average Assets				7.67				7.37

Average Balances
Average Loans and Leases				$	5,686,923			$	6,446,513
Average Assets				12,377,785				11,096,322
Average Deposits				9,390,615				8,751,374
Average Shareholders’ Equity				949,073				818,218

Market Price Per Share of Common Stock
Closing				$	44.95			$	32.98
High				50.42				45.24
Low				41.60				25.33

	March 31,			December 31,				March 31,
	2010			2009				2009
As of Period End:
Balance Sheet Totals
Loans and Leases	$	5,610,081		$	5,759,785			$	6,338,726
Total Assets	12,435,670			12,414,827				11,448,128
Total Deposits	9,494,084			9,409,676				9,212,791
Long-Term Debt	90,309			90,317				59,003
Total Shareholders’ Equity	939,372			895,973				833,935

Asset Quality
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses	$	146,358		$	143,658			$	134,416
Non-Performing Assets 5	41,624			48,331				40,329

Financial Ratios
Allowance to Loans and Leases Outstanding	2.61		%	2.49			%	2.12		%
Tier 1 Capital Ratio 6	15.93			14.84				11.98
Total Capital Ratio 7	17.20			16.11				13.24
Leverage Ratio 8	6.97			6.76				6.92
Tangible Common Equity to Total Assets 9	7.30			6.96				6.97
Tangible Common Equity to Risk-Weighted Assets 9	16.75			15.45				12.47

Non-Financial Data
Full-Time Equivalent Employees	2,400			2,418				2,587
Branches and Offices	83			83				85
ATMs	483			485				463

1 Efficiency ratio is defined as noninterest expense divided by total revenue (net interest income and total noninterest income).

2 Operating leverage is defined as the percentage change in income before the provision for credit losses and the provision for income taxes. Measures are presented on a linked quarter basis.

3 Net interest margin is defined as net interest income, on a taxable equivalent basis, as a percentage of average earning assets.

4 Dividend payout ratio is defined as dividends declared per share divided by basic earnings per share.

5 Excluded from non-performing assets are contractually binding non-accrual loans held for sale of $4.2 million as of December 31, 2009.

6 Tier 1 Capital Ratio as of December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009 was revised from 14.88% and 12.02%, respectively.

7 Total Capital Ratio as of December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009 was revised from 16.15% and 13.28%, respectively.

8 Leverage Ratio as of December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009 was revised from 6.78% and 6.94%, respectively.

9 Tangible common equity, a non-GAAP financial measure, is defined by the Company as shareholders’ equity minus goodwill and intangible assets. Intangible assets are included as a component of other assets in the Consolidated Statements of Condition.

Table of Contents

Analysis of Statements of Income

Average balances, related income and expenses, and resulting yields and rates are presented in Table 2. An analysis of the change in net interest income, on a taxable equivalent basis, is presented in Table 3.

Average Balances and Interest Rates - Taxable Equivalent Basis							Table 2
	Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2010						March 31, 2009
	Average		Income/		Yield/		Average		Income/		Yield/
(dollars in millions)	Balance		Expense		Rate		Balance		Expense		Rate
Earning Assets
Interest-Bearing Deposits	$	5.8	$	—	0.92	%	$	4.9	$	—	0.84	%
Funds Sold	463.1		0.3		0.27		912.9		0.6		0.25
Investment Securities
Trading	—		—		—		48.8		0.6		4.87
Available-for-Sale	5,241.0		44.1		3.37		2,628.7		32.5		4.95
Held-to-Maturity	174.1		1.9		4.28		235.0		2.6		4.37
Loans Held for Sale	8.8		0.5		23.80		21.8		0.2		4.41
Loans and Leases 1
Commercial and Industrial	788.5		10.2		5.25		1,031.3		10.4		4.11
Commercial Mortgage	838.0		10.5		5.09		730.6		9.6		5.32
Construction	108.0		1.3		4.99		154.1		1.6		4.21
Commercial Lease Financing	407.4		3.4		3.33		462.9		3.7		3.16
Residential Mortgage	2,160.6		30.9		5.73		2,437.4		36.3		5.96
Home Equity	909.4		11.3		5.02		1,028.7		13.0		5.13
Automobile	272.6		5.2		7.73		356.3		7.0		7.94
Other 2	202.4		3.9		7.76		245.2		4.8		7.86
Total Loans and Leases	5,686.9		76.7		5.44		6,446.5		86.4		5.40
Other	79.8		0.3		1.39		79.7		0.3		1.39
Total Earning Assets 3	11,659.5		123.8		4.27		10,378.3		123.2		4.77
Cash and Noninterest-Bearing Deposits	229.8						243.4
Other Assets	488.5						474.6
Total Assets	$	12,377.8					$	11,096.3

Interest-Bearing Liabilities
Interest-Bearing Deposits
Demand	$	1,662.0	0.3		0.07		$	1,888.6	0.3		0.06
Savings	4,434.2		4.4		0.40		3,533.0		8.2		0.94
Time	1,136.5		3.6		1.29		1,500.8		8.5		2.30
Total Interest-Bearing Deposits	7,232.7		8.3		0.47		6,922.4		17.0		1.00
Short-Term Borrowings	28.7		—		0.10		18.7		—		0.11
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase	1,531.7		6.4		1.68		935.4		6.7		2.85
Long-Term Debt	90.3		1.2		5.25		148.2		2.2		5.88
Total Interest-Bearing Liabilities	8,883.4		15.9		0.72		8,024.7		25.9		1.30
Net Interest Income			$	107.9					$	97.3
Interest Rate Spread					3.55	%					3.47	%
Net Interest Margin					3.72	%					3.76	%
Noninterest-Bearing Demand Deposits	2,157.9						1,829.0
Other Liabilities	387.4						424.4
Shareholders’ Equity	949.1						818.2
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	12,377.8					$	11,096.3

1 Non-performing loans and leases are included in the respective average loan and lease balances. Income, if any, on such loans and leases is recognized on a cash basis.

2 Comprised of other consumer revolving credit, installment, and consumer lease financing.

3 Interest income includes taxable equivalent basis adjustments, based upon a federal statutory tax rate of 35%, of $239,000 and $226,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Table of Contents

Analysis of Change in Net Interest Income - Taxable Equivalent Basis								Table 3
			Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
			Compared to March 31, 2009
(dollars in millions)	Volume 1				Rate 1			Total
Change in Interest Income:
Funds Sold	$	(0.3		)	$	—		$	(0.3	)
Investment Securities
Trading	(0.3			)	(0.3		)	(0.6		)
Available-for-Sale	24.4				(12.8		)	11.6
Held-to-Maturity	(0.7			)	—			(0.7		)
Loans Held for Sale	(0.2			)	0.5			0.3
Loans and Leases
Commercial and Industrial	(2.7			)	2.5			(0.2		)
Commercial Mortgage	1.3				(0.4		)	0.9
Construction	(0.6			)	0.3			(0.3		)
Commercial Lease Financing	(0.5			)	0.2			(0.3		)
Residential Mortgage	(4.0			)	(1.4		)	(5.4		)
Home Equity	(1.4			)	(0.3		)	(1.7		)
Automobile	(1.6			)	(0.2		)	(1.8		)
Other 2	(0.8			)	(0.1		)	(0.9		)
Total Loans and Leases	(10.3			)	0.6			(9.7		)
Total Change in Interest Income	12.6				(12.0		)	0.6

Change in Interest Expense:
Interest-Bearing Deposits
Savings	1.7				(5.5		)	(3.8		)
Time	(1.7			)	(3.2		)	(4.9		)
Total Interest-Bearing Deposits	—				(8.7		)	(8.7		)
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase	3.1				(3.4		)	(0.3		)
Long-Term Debt	(0.8			)	(0.2		)	(1.0		)
Total Change in Interest Expense	2.3				(12.3		)	(10.0		)

Change in Net Interest Income	$	10.3			$	0.3		$	10.6

1 The changes for each category of interest income and expense are allocated between the portion of changes attributable to the variance in volume and rate for that category.

2 Comprised of other consumer revolving credit, installment, and consumer lease financing.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income is affected by both changes in interest rates (rate) and the amount and composition of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities (volume). Net interest margin is calculated as the yield on average earning assets minus the interest rate paid on average interest-bearing liabilities.

As demand for new lending opportunities remained soft in 2009 and into 2010, we invested some of our liquidity into investment securities.

Net interest income, on a taxable equivalent basis, increased by $10.6 million or 11% in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009, primarily due to lower funding costs on our interest-bearing liabilities. Our net interest margin decreased by 4 basis points in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009.

Rates paid on our interest-bearing liabilities decreased by 58 basis points in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009, reflective of the re-pricing of our liabilities at lower interest rates. Rates paid on our interest-bearing

deposits decreased by 53 basis points and rates paid on our securities sold under agreement to repurchase decreased by 117 basis points, primarily due to lower rates paid on placements with government entities. Partially offsetting our lower funding costs were lower yields received on our interest-earning assets in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. Yields on our interest-earning assets decreased by 50 basis points in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009, primarily due to the lower yields in our investment securities portfolio. Although average balances of our investment securities available-for-sale portfolio increased by $2.6 billion, yields decreased by 158 basis points as a result of a lower risk and lower yield investment strategy. Also contributing to the lower yields on our interest-earning assets was a 23 basis point decrease in our yields earned on our residential mortgage loan portfolio, primarily due to customers refinancing their loans at lower interest rates. Partially offsetting the lower yields on these interest-earning assets was a 114 basis point increase in our yields on commercial and industrial loans due to a $2.4 million interest recovery in February 2010 related to a loan that was charged-off in 2002. We also recognized a $0.4 million interest recovery on a commercial loan held for sale in March 2010.

Table of Contents

Average balances of our interest-earning assets increased by $1.3 billion or 12% in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009, primarily due to the previously noted $2.6 billion increase in our investment securities available-for-sale portfolio. The deployment of funds was primarily made in mortgage-backed securities issued by government agencies and debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury. Partially offsetting the increase in our investment securities available-for-sale portfolio was a $759.6 million or 12% decrease in our average loans and leases in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. This decrease was due to continued pay downs in loan and lease balances, along with weak demand for new lending opportunities. Average balances of our interest-bearing liabilities increased by $858.7 million or 11% in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. The average balances in our savings deposits increased by $901.2 million, primarily due to the continued success of our bonus rate savings and business money market savings products. This increase was partially offset by a $364.3 million decrease in average time deposit balances, as some customers moved their deposits to more liquid savings products, and a $226.6 million decrease in our average interest-bearing demand deposit balances, as some customers sought higher yielding deposit products. Also contributing to the increase in our average interest-bearing liabilities was a $596.3 million increase in average balances of securities sold under agreements to repurchase in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. This increase was primarily due to a government entity moving funds from a savings account to an account under securities sold under agreements to repurchase.

Provision for Credit Losses

The Provision reflects our judgment of the expense or benefit necessary to achieve the appropriate amount of the Allowance. We maintain the Allowance at levels adequate to cover our estimate of probable credit losses as of the end of the reporting period. The Allowance is determined through detailed quarterly analyses of the loan and lease portfolio. The Allowance is based on our loss experience and changes in the economic environment, as well as an ongoing assessment of our credit quality. We recorded a Provision of $20.7 million in the first quarter of 2010 compared to a Provision of $24.9 million in the first quarter of 2009. The lower Provision recorded in the first quarter of 2010 reflects stabilizing economic conditions, partially offset by continued weakness in our consumer loan portfolios. For further discussion on the Allowance, see the “Corporate Risk Profile — Reserve for Credit Losses” section in MD&A.

Noninterest Income

Noninterest income increased by $1.4 million or 2% in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009.

Trust and asset management income remained relatively unchanged in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. Mutual fund management fees decreased by $1.3 million primarily due to an increase in fee waivers in our money market funds due to low yields, as well as a decline in our money market fund holdings. However, the decrease was entirely offset by increases in other fees such as special service fees, agency fees, and tax service fees. Total trust assets under administration were $10.1 billion as of March 31, 2010, $9.9 billion as of December 31, 2009, and $9.1 billion as of March 31, 2009.

Mortgage banking income decreased by $5.2 million or 60% in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. This decrease was primarily due to lower loan origination volume for the quarter, the result of lower refinancing activity due to higher interest rates on conforming saleable mortgage-based products in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. Residential mortgage loan originations were $151.5 million in the first quarter of 2010, a $337.7 million or 69% decrease compared to the same period in 2009. Residential mortgage loan sales were $113.3 million in the first quarter of 2010, a $285.1 million or 72% decrease compared to the same period in 2009.

Service charges on deposit accounts were $13.8 million for the first quarter of 2010 compared to $13.4 million for the same period in 2009. These results include overdraft fees. Beginning on July 1, 2010 for new customers and August 15, 2010 for existing customers, federal rules will prohibit a financial institution from assessing a fee to complete an ATM withdrawal or one-time debit card transaction which will cause an overdraft unless the customer consents in advance (“opts-in”). In the first quarter of 2010, we charged customers approximately $6.3 million in overdraft fees for ATM and one-time debit card transactions.

Investment securities net gains were $20.0 million in the first quarter of 2010 compared to $0.1 million in the first quarter of 2009. We sold available-for-sale investment securities in the first quarter of 2010 to preserve capital levels while managing our duration and extension risk in a potentially rising interest rate environment in future reporting periods.

Insurance income decreased by $2.9 million or 52% in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. This decrease was largely due to the sale of assets of our retail insurance brokerage operation, Bank of Hawaii Insurance Services, Inc. in June 2009, and our wholesale insurance business, BOH Wholesale Insurance Agency, Inc. (formerly known as Triad Insurance Agency, Inc.) in October 2009. Partially offsetting this decrease was a $0.4 million increase in income from annuity and life insurance products.

Other noninterest income decreased by $10.4 million or 65% in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. This decrease was primarily due to a $10.0 million pre-tax gain from the sale of our equity interest in two watercraft leveraged leases in the first quarter of 2009.

Table of Contents

Noninterest Expense

Noninterest expense decreased by $6.2 million or 7% in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009.

Table 4 presents the components of salaries and benefits expense for the first quarter of 2010 and 2009.

Salaries and Benefits	Table 4
	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2010		2009
Salaries	$	29,143	$	29,845
Incentive Compensation	3,446		3,292
Share-Based Compensation and Cash Grants for the Purchase of Company Stock	556		787
Commission Expense	1,346		2,255
Retirement and Other Benefits	4,109		4,619
Payroll Taxes	3,433		3,500
Medical, Dental, and Life Insurance	2,480		2,664
Separation Expense	51		66
Total Salaries and Benefits	$	44,564	$	47,028

Salaries and benefits expense decreased by $2.5 million or 5% in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. This decrease was primarily due to a $0.9 million decrease in commission expense, a $0.7 million decrease in base salaries as a result of fewer full-time equivalent employees, and a $0.5 million decrease in retirement and other benefits.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance expense increased by $1.3 million or 71% in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. The increase was primarily due to the Company fully utilizing its credits from the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005, which were available to offset our deposit insurance assessments, in March 2009.

Other noninterest expense decreased by $4.6 million or 21% in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. This decrease was primarily due to:

· $1.8 million reduction in expenses related to legal claims and contingencies;

· $1.2 million decrease in operational losses; and

· $0.9 million premium recorded in the first quarter of 2009 related to the early repayment of our $25.0 million privately placed notes.

Provision for Income Taxes

Table 5 presents our provision for income taxes and effective tax rates for the first quarter of 2010 and 2009.

Provision for Income Taxes and Effective Tax Rates							Table 5
			Three Months Ended
			March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2010				2009
Provision for Income Taxes	$	24,282			$	18,567
Effective Tax Rates	31.53			%	34.00			%

The lower effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 was primarily due to the expected utilization of capital losses on the sale of a low-income housing investment.

Table of Contents

Analysis of Statements of Condition

Investment Securities

The carrying value of our investment securities was $5.6 billion as of March 31, 2010, $5.5 billion as of December 31, 2009, and $3.3 billion as of March 31, 2009. The increase in the carrying value of our investment securities from December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009 was primarily due to additional investments made in mortgage-backed securities issued by government agencies and debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury. These investments in high grade securities with base durations of less than three years, allows us to maintain flexibility to redeploy funds as opportunities may arise. Gross unrealized gains in our investment securities portfolio were $74.8 million as of March 31, 2010, $68.5 million as of December 31, 2009, and $69.1 million as of March 31, 2009.

Gross unrealized losses on our temporarily impaired investment securities were $7.2 million as of March 31, 2010, $21.8 million as of December 31, 2009, and $27.7 million as of March 31, 2009. As of March 31, 2010, the gross unrealized losses were primarily related to mortgage-backed securities issued by government agencies attributable to changes in interest rates, relative to when the investment securities were purchased.

As of March 31, 2010, we did not own any subordinated debt, or preferred or common stock of the Federal National Mortgage Association or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation. As of March 31, 2010, we also did not own any private-label mortgage backed securities. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.

Loans and Leases

Table 6 presents the composition of our loan and lease portfolio by major categories.

Loan and Lease Portfolio Balances									Table 6
	March 31,		December 31,		September 30,		June 30,		March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		2009		2009		2009
Commercial
Commercial and Industrial	$	782,298	$	795,167	$	845,056	$	932,444	$	1,000,640
Commercial Mortgage	834,086		841,431		777,498		788,226		726,193
Construction	104,349		108,395		137,414		140,455		153,754
Lease Financing	398,939		412,933		458,696		468,030		454,822
Total Commercial	2,119,672		2,157,926		2,218,664		2,329,155		2,335,409
Consumer
Residential Mortgage	2,138,094		2,190,677		2,246,729		2,309,971		2,402,061
Home Equity	892,109		921,571		952,076		977,632		1,016,381
Automobile	260,472		283,937		299,657		309,877		343,642
Other 1	199,734		205,674		214,232		223,276		241,233
Total Consumer	3,490,409		3,601,859		3,712,694		3,820,756		4,003,317
Total Loans and Leases	$	5,610,081	$	5,759,785	$	5,931,358	$	6,149,911	$	6,338,726

1 Comprised of other revolving credit, installment, and lease financing.

Total loans and leases as of March 31, 2010 decreased by $149.7 million or 3% from December 31, 2009 and decreased by $728.6 million or 11% from March 31, 2009.

Commercial loans and leases as of March 31, 2010 decreased by $38.3 million or 2% from December 31, 2009, with balances decreasing in all commercial lending categories during the first quarter of 2010. Demand for commercial lending opportunities continues to remain soft as a result of current economic conditions. Commercial loans and leases as of March 31, 2010 decreased by $215.7 million or 9% from March 31, 2009. Commercial loans and leases decreased in all lending categories, except for commercial mortgage, which was consistent with the slow economy in Hawaii and our

efforts to reduce risk in our positions in Shared National Credits and leveraged leases. The increase in our commercial mortgage portfolio from March 31, 2009 was primarily due to one new commercial credit added in the second quarter of 2009 and our purchase of a $47.5 million portfolio of seasoned loans, secured by real estate in Hawaii, in December 2009.

Consumer loans and leases as of March 31, 2010 decreased by $111.5 million or 3% from December 31, 2009 and decreased by $512.9 million or 13% from March 31, 2009. Balances in all consumer lending categories decreased over the past 12 months due to reduced customer demand in a slow economy as well as our disciplined underwriting approach.

Table of Contents

Table 7 presents the composition of our loan and lease portfolio by geographic area and by major categories.

Geographic Distribution of Loan and Lease Portfolio									Table 7
	March 31,		December 30,		September 30,		June 30,		March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		2009		2009		2009
Commercial
Hawaii
Commercial and Industrial	$	628,777	$	632,415	$	649,686	$	685,333	$	661,733
Commercial Mortgage	763,913		769,303		701,712		701,135		640,224
Construction	104,349		108,395		133,668		134,638		146,258
Lease Financing	38,021		39,664		43,079		45,507		50,311
U.S. Mainland 1
Commercial and Industrial	80,449		90,345		121,495		171,062		232,772
Commercial Mortgage	2,415		2,570		4,050		14,086		14,210
Construction	—		—		3,746		5,817		6,220
Lease Financing	324,054		335,507		378,605		385,064		372,008
Guam
Commercial and Industrial	58,890		62,197		62,599		64,151		73,595
Commercial Mortgage	64,419		66,113		68,205		69,667		70,056
Construction	—		—		—		—		1,276
Lease Financing	17,724		18,600		17,848		18,293		14,479
Other Pacific Islands
Commercial and Industrial	6,560		7,047		7,557		8,470		9,343
Commercial Mortgage	1,230		1,330		1,409		1,510		1,609
Foreign 2
Commercial and Industrial	7,622		3,163		3,719		3,428		23,197
Commercial Mortgage	2,109		2,115		2,122		1,828		94
Lease Financing	19,140		19,162		19,164		19,166		18,024
Total Commercial	2,119,672		2,157,926		2,218,664		2,329,155		2,335,409
Consumer
Hawaii
Residential Mortgage	1,948,831		1,996,713		2,046,966		2,103,104		2,189,237
Home Equity	851,957		879,903		908,051		931,010		967,570
Automobile	192,759		208,130		216,843		219,346		239,960
Other 3	156,985		159,010		163,092		167,695		181,102
U.S. Mainland 1
Home Equity	18,608		19,659		21,093		23,222		25,876
Automobile	26,198		29,645		32,675		36,302		41,785
Guam
Residential Mortgage	181,837		186,374		192,078		198,941		204,902
Home Equity	19,107		19,043		19,884		20,223		19,726
Automobile	38,381		42,482		46,095		49,799		56,665
Other 3	21,792		23,630		25,639		27,475		29,518
Other Pacific Islands
Residential Mortgage	7,426		7,590		7,685		7,926		7,922
Home Equity	2,437		2,966		3,048		3,177		3,209
Automobile	3,134		3,680		4,044		4,430		5,232
Other 3	20,951		23,027		25,497		28,096		30,609
Foreign 2
Other 3	6		7		4		10		4
Total Consumer	3,490,409		3,601,859		3,712,694		3,820,756		4,003,317
Total Loans and Leases	$	5,610,081	$	5,759,785	$	5,931,358	$	6,149,911	$	6,338,726

1 For secured loans and leases, classification as U.S. Mainland is made based on where the collateral is located. For unsecured loans and leases, classification as U.S. Mainland is made based on the location where the majority of the borrower’s business operations are conducted.

2 Loans classified as Foreign represent those which are recorded in the Company’s international business units. Lease financing classified as Foreign represent those with air transportation carriers based outside the United States.

3 Comprised of other revolving credit, installment, and lease financing.

Table of Contents

Our commercial and consumer lending activities are concentrated primarily in Hawaii and the Pacific Islands. Our commercial loan and lease portfolio to borrowers based on the U.S. Mainland includes participation in Shared National Credits and leveraged lease financing. Our consumer loan and lease portfolio includes limited lending activities on the U.S. Mainland.

Other Assets

Table 8 presents the major components of other assets as of March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009, and March 31, 2009.

Other Assets					Table 8
	March 31,		December 31,		March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		2009
Bank-Owned Life Insurance	$	204,310	$	202,649	$	197,863
Federal and State Tax Deposits	83,400		82,500		82,500
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank Stock	79,758		79,758		79,705
Prepaid Expenses	49,700		49,789		11,685
Low-Income Housing and Other Equity Investments	28,199		27,814		29,490
Derivative Financial Instruments	22,062		20,696		34,565
Accounts Receivable	13,411		13,821		16,530
Other	21,950		19,895		21,436
Total Other Assets	$	502,790	$	496,922	$	473,774

Other assets as of March 31, 2010 increased by $5.9 million or 1% from December 31, 2009. The increase in other assets from December 31, 2009 was primarily due to a $2.3 million increase in the estimated fair value of our customer-related interest rate swap accounts, which have off-setting amounts recorded in other liabilities. Also contributing to the increase in other assets was a $1.7 million increase in the value of our bank-owned life insurance and a $0.9 million increase each in our federal tax deposit account and in receivable balances related to the sale of investment securities which were in the process of settlement as of period end.

Other assets as of March 31, 2010 increased by $29.0 million or 6% from March 31, 2009. The increase in other assets from March 31, 2009 was primarily due to a $42.3 million prepayment of our FDIC quarterly risk-based assessments for 2010, 2011, and 2012 which was made in December 2009. The remaining balance of this prepayment to the FDIC was $39.7 million as of March 31, 2010. Also contributing to the increase in other assets was a $6.4 million increase in the value of our bank-owned life insurance. This was partially offset by a $12.5 million decrease in the estimated fair value of our derivative financial instruments and a $2.9 million

decrease in accounts receivable, arising in the normal course of business.

As of March 31, 2010, the carrying value of our Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle (“FHLB”) stock was $61.3 million. Our investment in the FHLB is a condition of membership and, as such, is required to obtain credit and other services from the FHLB. As of December 31, 2009, the FHLB met all of its regulatory capital requirements, but remained classified as “undercapitalized” by its primary regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, due to several factors including the possibility that further declines in the value of its private-label mortgage-backed securities could cause it to fall below its risk-based capital requirements. Due to this determination, the FHLB remains unable to repurchase or redeem capital stock or to pay dividends. The Bank continues to use and has access to the services of the FHLB. Management considers several factors in evaluating impairment including the commitment of the issuer to perform its obligations and to provide services to the Bank. Based upon the foregoing, management has not recorded an impairment of the carrying value of our FHLB stock as of March 31, 2010.

Table of Contents

Deposits

Table 9 presents the composition of our deposits by major customer categories.

Deposits									Table 9
	March 31,		December 31,		September 30,		June 30,		March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		2009		2009		2009
Consumer	$	4,940,576	$	4,926,567	$	4,776,626	$	4,747,612	$	4,702,494
Commercial	4,125,587		4,114,583		4,002,068		3,828,521		3,645,842
Public and Other	427,921		368,526		471,406		443,528		864,455
Total Deposits	$	9,494,084	$	9,409,676	$	9,250,100	$	9,019,661	$	9,212,791

Deposit balances as of March 31, 2010 increased by $84.4 million or 1% from December 31, 2009. The increase was primarily due to a $79.8 million increase in our bonus rate savings products, a $46.2 million increase in our qualified public money management accounts, and a $38.0 million increase in our public time deposits. This was partially offset by a $68.7 million decrease in our analyzed business checking accounts.

Deposit balances as of March 31, 2010 increased by $281.3 million or 3% from March 31, 2009. The increase was primarily due to a $421.1 million increase in our bonus rate savings products, a $386.8 million increase in our business money market savings accounts, and a $181.1 million increase in our business checking accounts. This was partially offset by a $403.2 million decrease in our commercial and consumer time deposits and a $319.8 decrease in our qualified public money management accounts.

Table 10 presents the composition of our savings deposits.

Savings Deposits									Table 10
	March 31,		December 31,		September 30,		June 30,		March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		2009		2009		2009
Money Market	$	2,005,902	$	1,967,554	$	2,008,094	$	1,769,023	$	1,607,375
Regular Savings	2,509,695		2,438,415		2,357,163		2,285,016		2,298,334
Total Savings Deposits	$	4,515,597	$	4,405,969	$	4,365,257	$	4,054,039	$	3,905,709

Table 11 presents our quarterly average balance of time deposits of $100,000 or more.

Average Time Deposits of $100,000 or More									Table 11
	Three Months Ended
	March 31,		December 31,		September 30,		June 30,		March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		2009		2009		2009
Average Time Deposits	$	655,594	$	670,985	$	709,323	$	738,488	$	851,582

Borrowings and Long-Term Debt

Borrowings consisted of funds purchased and short-term borrowings, including commercial paper. Borrowings were $16.2 million as of March 31, 2010, a $0.4 million or 3% increase from December 31, 2009, and a $3.5 million or 18% decrease from March 31, 2009. We manage the level of our borrowings to provide adequate sources of liquidity. Due to our high level of deposits and increased capital levels, we have minimized the level of borrowings as a source of funds.

Long-term debt was $90.3 million as of March 31, 2010, relatively unchanged from December 31, 2009, and a $31.3 million or 53% increase from March 31, 2009. The increase in long-term debt from March 31, 2009 was primarily due to a May 2009 transaction in which we replaced an existing leveraged lease with a direct financing lease with a sub-lessee to the leveraged lease transaction. This resulted in the recognition of $32.4 million in non-recourse debt on the Consolidated Statements of Condition, which was previously not recognized as an obligation of the Company under leveraged lease accounting treatment.

Table of Contents

Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase

Table 12 presents the composition of our securities sold under agreements to repurchase as of March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009, and March 31, 2009.

Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase					Table 12
	March 31,		December 31,		March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		2009
Government Entities	$	854,047	$	943,717	$	169,283
Private Institutions	675,000		675,000		675,000
Total Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase	$	1,529,047	$	1,618,717	$	844,283

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase as of March 31, 2010 decreased by $89.7 million or 6% from December 31, 2009. The decrease was primarily due to our ongoing evaluation of our liquidity position. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase as of March 31, 2010 increased by $684.8 million or 81% from March 31, 2009. The increase was primarily due to new placements to accommodate local government entities. As of March 31, 2010, the weighted average maturity was 40 days for our securities sold under agreements to repurchase with government entities and 7.04 years for securities sold under agreements to repurchase with private institutions, subject to the private institutions’ right to terminate agreements at earlier specified dates which could decrease the weighted average maturity to 352 days. As of March 31, 2010, $125.0 million of our securities sold under agreements to repurchase placed with private institutions were indexed to the London Inter Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) with the remaining $550.0 million at fixed interest rates. If the agreements indexed to LIBOR with private institutions are not terminated by specified dates, the interest rates on the agreements become fixed, at rates ranging from 4.25% to 5.00%, for the remaining term of the respective agreements. As of March 31, 2010, the weighted average interest rate for outstanding agreements with government entities and private institutions was 0.14% and 3.65%, respectively. We have not entered into agreements in which the securities sold and the related liability was not recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Condition.

Shareholders’ Equity

As of March 31, 2010, shareholders’ equity was $939.4 million, an increase of $43.4 million or 5% from December 31, 2009, and an increase of $105.4 million or 13% from March 31, 2009. The increase in shareholders’ equity from December 31, 2009 was primarily due to earnings for the first quarter of 2010 of $52.7 million and changes in the fair value of our investment securities available-for-sale, net of tax, of $10.8 million. The change in fair value of our investment securities available-for-sale, net of tax, was primarily due to favorable interest rate movements and the larger investment securities portfolio as of March 31, 2010. This was partially offset by cash dividends paid of $21.6 million. Consistent with our strategy to build capital levels, we have not repurchased shares of our common stock in 2010. Further discussion on our capital structure is included in the “Corporate Risk Profile — Capital Management” section of MD&A.

Table of Contents

Analysis of Business Segments

Our business segments are Retail Banking, Commercial Banking, Investment Services, and Treasury.

Table 13 summarizes net income from our business segments for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. Additional information about segment performance is presented in Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Business Segment Net Income			Table 13
	Three Months Ended March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2010		2009
Retail Banking	$	9,702	$	14,987
Commercial Banking	13,962		18,595
Investment Services	3,206		676
Total	26,870		34,258
Treasury and Other	25,866		1,782
Consolidated Total	$	52,736	$	36,040

Retail Banking

Net income decreased by $5.3 million or 35% in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009, primarily due to a decrease in net interest income and noninterest income. This was partially offset by a decrease in the Provision and noninterest expense. The $6.2 million decrease in net interest income was primarily due to lower earnings credits on the segment’s deposit portfolio, partially offset by higher average deposit balances. The $4.5 million decrease in noninterest income was primarily due to lower mortgage banking income, a result of lower originations and sales activity. The $1.2 million decrease in the Provision was primarily due to a reduction in the allocation to the segment’s home equity portfolio. The $1.1 million decrease in noninterest expense was primarily due to lower commissions expense from lower mortgage originations and sales activity.

Commercial Banking

Net income decreased by $4.6 million or 25% in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009, primarily due to a decrease in noninterest income. This was partially offset by a decrease in the Provision and noninterest expense, as well as an increase in net interest income. The $14.2 million decrease in noninterest income was primarily due to the $10.0 million pre-tax gain on the sale of our equity interest in two watercraft leveraged leases as well as the sale of assets of our wholesale and retail insurance businesses in 2009. The $2.6 million decrease in the Provision was primarily due to lower net charge-offs of loans and leases in the segment. The $2.3 million decrease in noninterest expense was primarily due to the aforementioned sale of assets of our wholesale and retail insurance businesses in 2009. The $1.7 million increase in net interest income was primarily due to an interest recovery on a previously charged-off loan.

Investment Services

Net income increased by $2.5 million in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009, primarily due to a decrease in noninterest expense and the Provision, as well as an increase in noninterest income. The $2.5 million decrease in noninterest expense was primarily due to lower other operating and allocated expenses. The $0.6 million decrease in the Provision was due to lower net charge-offs of loans in the segment. The $0.6 million increase in noninterest income was primarily due to higher annuity, life insurance, and securities fee income from the segment’s full-service brokerage.

Treasury

Net income increased by $24.1 million in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009, primarily due to higher noninterest income and net interest income, partially offset by a $10.3 million increase in the provision for income taxes. The $19.6 million increase in noninterest income was primarily due to gains on sales of investment securities. The $14.8 million increase in net interest income was primarily due to a decrease in the funding cost of the segment’s deposit balances.

Other organizational units (Technology, Operations, Marketing, Human Resources, Finance, Credit and Risk Management, Corporate Services Group, and Corporate and Regulatory Administration) included in Treasury provide a wide-range of support to our other income earning segments. Expenses incurred by these support units are charged to the business segments through an internal cost allocation process.

Table of Contents

Corporate Risk Profile

Credit Risk

As of March 31, 2010, our overall credit risk position is reflective of a weak, but stabilizing economy, with non-performing assets remaining at elevated levels, although at lower levels than December 31, 2009. The decline in visitor arrivals appears to be stabilizing, and spending, while still weak, also showed signs of stabilization. The construction and real estate industries in Hawaii remain weak. Hawaii’s seasonally-adjusted unemployment rate increased slightly from 6.8% in December 2009 to 6.9% in February 2010. We have experienced higher delinquencies and loss rates in our loan and lease portfolio, with the primary impact in our commercial and industrial, construction, and mortgage-related consumer lending portfolios. However, as noted in Table 14, balances in our loan and lease portfolio which demonstrate a higher risk profile have decreased from December 31, 2009.

Residential home building loans represent $53.7 million or 51% of our total commercial construction portfolio balance as of March 31, 2010. Higher risk exposure in our residential home building portfolio was $29.5 million as of March 31, 2010, of which $3.3 million was included in non-performing assets. As of March 31, 2010, $6.1 million of this higher risk exposure relates to residential development projects outside of Oahu. The decrease in our higher risk exposure from December 31, 2009 was primarily due to the repayment of a $3.0 million loan, which was partially offset by the addition of a $2.2 million loan to this category.

Land loans in our residential mortgage portfolio often represents higher risk due to the volatility in the value of the underlying collateral. Our Hawaii residential land loan portfolio was $33.5 million as of March 31, 2010, of which $28.8 million related to properties on Hawaiian islands other than Oahu.

Higher Risk Loans Outstanding									Table 14
	March 31,		December 31,		September 30,		June 30,		March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		2009		2009		2009
Residential Home Building	$	29,475	$	31,067	$	38,592	$	22,850	$	8,536
Residential Land Loans	33,514		37,873		43,128		47,871		50,663
Home Equity Loans	24,595		28,076		24,339		21,832		19,431
Air Transportation	39,743		50,426		60,996		62,148		76,303

The higher risk segment within our Hawaii home equity lending portfolio was $24.6 million or 3% of our total home equity loans outstanding as of March 31, 2010. The higher risk segment within our Hawaii home equity portfolio includes those loans originated in 2005 or later, with current monitoring credit scores below 600, and with original loan-to-value (“LTV”) ratios greater than 70%.

We also continue to have elevated risk in our air transportation portfolio. As of March 31, 2010, included in our commercial leasing portfolio were four leveraged leases on aircraft that were originated in the 1990’s and prior. Outstanding credit exposure related to these leveraged leases was $28.1 million as of March 31, 2010 and $38.4 million as of December 31,

2009. The decrease in our air transportation credit exposure from December 31, 2009 was primarily due to the sale of our equity interest in an aircraft leveraged lease in the first quarter of 2010. Relative to our total loan and lease portfolio, domestic air transportation carriers continue to demonstrate a higher risk profile due to fuel costs, pension plan obligations, consumer demand, and marginal pricing power. We believe that volatile fuel costs, coupled with a weak economy, could place additional pressure on the financial health of air transportation carriers for the foreseeable future.

These higher risk loans and leases have been considered in our quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the Allowance.

Table of Contents

Non-Performing Assets

Table 15 presents information on non-performing assets (“NPA”) and accruing loans and leases past due 90 days or more.

Non-Performing Assets and Accruing Loans and Leases Past Due 90 Days or More													Table 15
	March 31,			December 31,			September 30,			June 30,			March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2010			2009			2009			2009			2009
Non-Performing Assets 1
Non-Accrual Loans and Leases
Commercial
Commercial and Industrial	$	3,342		$	6,646		$	9,924		$	10,511		$	21,839
Commercial Mortgage	1,662			1,167			1,193			1,219			—
Construction	7,297			8,154			15,534			6,548			5,001
Lease Financing	73			631			690			956			910
Total Commercial	12,374			16,598			27,341			19,234			27,750
Consumer
Residential Mortgage	23,214			19,893			16,718			16,265			9,230
Home Equity	2,844			5,153			3,726			2,567			1,620
Other 2	—			550			550			550			1,383
Total Consumer	26,058			25,596			20,994			19,382			12,233
Total Non-Accrual Loans and Leases	38,432			42,194			48,335			38,616			39,983
Non-Accrual Loans Held for Sale	—			3,005			—			—			—
Foreclosed Real Estate	3,192			3,132			201			438			346
Total Non-Performing Assets	$	41,624		$	48,331		$	48,536		$	39,054		$	40,329
Accruing Loans and Leases Past Due 90 Days or More
Commercial
Commercial and Industrial	$	2,192		$	623		$	137		$	13		$	—
Construction	2,170			—			3,005			—			—
Lease Financing	—			120			—			—			257
Total Commercial	4,362			743			3,142			13			257
Consumer
Residential Mortgage	8,136			8,979			5,951			4,657			4,794
Home Equity	1,608			2,210			1,698			2,879			1,720
Automobile	571			875			749			769			776
Other 2	1,345			886			739			1,270			1,100
Total Consumer	11,660			12,950			9,137			9,575			8,390
Total Accruing Loans and Leases Past Due 90 Days or More	$	16,022		$	13,693		$	12,279		$	9,588		$	8,647
Restructured Loans Not Included in Non-Accrual Loans and Accruing Loans Past Due 90 Days or More	$	15,686		$	7,274		$	7,578		$	2,307		$	—
Total Loans and Leases	$	5,610,081		$	5,759,785		$	5,931,358		$	6,149,911		$	6,338,726
Ratio of Non-Accrual Loans and Leases to Total Loans and Leases	0.69		%	0.73		%	0.81		%	0.63		%	0.63		%
Ratio of Non-Performing Assets to Total Loans and Leases, Loans Held for Sale, and Foreclosed Real Estate	0.74		%	0.84		%	0.82		%	0.63		%	0.63		%
Ratio of Commercial Non-Performing Assets to Total Commercial Loans and Leases, Commercial Loans Held for Sale, and Commercial Foreclosed Real Estate	0.72		%	1.03		%	1.23		%	0.82		%	1.19		%
Ratio of Consumer Non-Performing Assets to Total Consumer Loans and Leases and Consumer Foreclosed Real Estate	0.76		%	0.72		%	0.57		%	0.52		%	0.31		%
Ratio of Non-Performing Assets and Accruing Loans and Leases Past Due 90 Days or More to Total Loans and Leases, Loans Held for Sale, and Foreclosed Real Estate	1.02		%	1.07		%	1.02		%	0.79		%	0.77		%

Quarter to Quarter Changes in Non-Performing Assets 1
Balance at Beginning of Quarter	$	48,331		$	48,536		$	39,054		$	40,329		$	14,949
Additions	9,533			14,874			22,856			22,459			29,164
Reductions
Payments	(5,689		)	(4,128		)	(6,899		)	(15,593		)	(874		)
Return to Accrual Status	(3,505		)	(1,818		)	(3,373		)	(230		)	(768		)
Sales of Foreclosed Real Estate	—			(38		)	(237		)	—			(82		)
Charge-offs/Write-downs	(7,046		)	(9,095		)	(2,865		)	(7,911		)	(2,060		)
Total Reductions	(16,240		)	(15,079		)	(13,374		)	(23,734		)	(3,784		)
Balance at End of Quarter	$	41,624		$	48,331		$	48,536		$	39,054		$	40,329

1 Excluded from non-performing assets were contractually binding non-accrual loans held for sale of $4.2 million, $7.7 million, and $5.2 million as of December 31, 2009, September 30, 2009, and June 30, 2009, respectively.

2 Comprised of other revolving credit, installment, and lease financing.

Table of Contents

NPAs are comprised of non-accrual loans and leases, non-accrual loans held for sale, and foreclosed real estate. Changes in the level of non-accrual loans and leases typically represent increases for loans and leases that reach a specified past due status, offset by reductions for loans and leases that are charged-off, sold, transferred to foreclosed real estate, or are no longer classified as non-accrual because they return to accrual status.

Overall credit quality reflects a stabilizing economy, albeit with NPAs at elevated levels. Our NPAs were $41.6 million as of March 31, 2010, a decrease of $6.7 million from December 31, 2009. This decrease was primarily due to the repayment of a $3.0 million non-accrual commercial construction loan that had been classified as held for sale, as well as a $3.3 million decrease in non-accrual commercial and industrial loans and a $2.3 million decrease in non-accrual home equity loans. This was partially offset by a $3.3 million increase in non-accrual residential mortgage loans during the first quarter of 2010. The ratio of our NPAs to total loans and leases, loans held for sale, and foreclosed real estate was 0.74% as of March 31, 2010, compared to 0.84% as of December 31, 2009. Although NPAs are at lower levels compared to December 31, 2009, NPAs may increase in future periods due to an often lengthy resolution period in addressing problem loans and leases.

Commercial and industrial NPAs decreased by $3.3 million from December 31, 2009, primarily due to $2.1 million in net charge-offs and the payoff of a $0.9 million loan.

Construction loan NPAs decreased by $0.9 million from December 31, 2009, primarily due to the partial charge-off of an existing non-accrual loan. Non-accrual loan exposure in this portfolio is comprised of four construction loans. We have evaluated each of these loans for impairment and have taken partial charge-offs on two of these loans and we believe that we are well-secured on the third loan. The fourth loan is also well-secured, with a 12% LTV ratio, as it represents the senior tranche in a structured loan with a high level of subordination.

Residential mortgage NPAs increased by $3.3 million from December 31, 2009, primarily due to the addition to non-accrual status of eight owner-occupant loans in Hawaii totaling $6.1 million. This was partially offset by the removal from NPAs of 27 non-accrual residential mortgage loans totaling $2.4 million during the first quarter of 2010. As of March 31, 2010, our residential mortgage loan NPAs were comprised of 78 loans with a weighted average current LTV ratio of 75%.

Home Equity NPAs decreased by $2.3 million from December 31, 2009, primarily due to increased charge-offs during the first quarter of 2010.

Impaired loans are defined as loans which we believe it is probable we will not collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans primarily consisted of non-accrual commercial loans, as well as commercial and consumer loans whose terms have been modified in a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”). Impaired loans were $33.3 million as of March 31, 2010, $24.7 million as of December 31, 2009, and $26.4 million as of March 31, 2009. Impaired loans had a related Allowance of $1.2 million as of March 31, 2010, $2.3 million as of December 31, 2009, and $4.6 million as of March 31, 2009.

We had loans whose terms had been modified in a TDR of $19.8 million as of March 31, 2010, primarily in our residential mortgage, commercial mortgage, and consumer automobile loan portfolios. Loans modified in a TDR were primarily the result of the modification of interest rates to below market rates and extensions of maturity dates.

Loans and Leases Past Due 90 Days or More and Still Accruing Interest

Loans and leases in this category are 90 days or more past due, as to principal or interest, and still accruing interest because they are well secured and in the process of collection. Loans and leases past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest were $16.0 million as of March 31, 2010, a $2.3 million increase from December 31, 2009 and a $7.4 million increase from March 31, 2009. The increase from December 31, 2009 was primarily due to two commercial loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest as of March 31, 2010. Both loans are in the process of being restructured and the borrowers are continuing to make interest payments. We expect that the loans will be returned to current status. The increase from March 31, 2009 was due to the two commercial loans noted above, as well as increased delinquency activity in our consumer loans. The weak economy has adversely affected consumer delinquency activity, particularly in our portfolios that are affected by residential real estate.

Table of Contents

Reserve for Credit Losses

Table 16 presents the activity in our reserve for credit losses.

Reserve for Credit Losses							Table 16
	Three Months Ended
	March 31,			December 31,			March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2010			2009			2009
Balance at Beginning of Period	$	149,077		$	148,077		$	128,667
Loans and Leases Charged-Off
Commercial
Commercial and Industrial	(3,906		)	(3,148		)	(6,464		)
Commercial Mortgage	(303		)	—			—
Construction	(857		)	(4,515		)	—
Lease Financing	(190		)	(9,409		)	(20		)
Consumer
Residential Mortgage	(3,255		)	(2,697		)	(827		)
Home Equity	(7,436		)	(3,489		)	(2,316		)
Automobile	(2,027		)	(2,209		)	(2,982		)
Other 1	(2,822		)	(2,981		)	(3,577		)
Total Loans and Leases Charged-Off	(20,796		)	(28,448		)	(16,186		)
Recoveries on Loans and Leases Previously Charged-Off
Commercial
Commercial and Industrial	858			189			542
Commercial Mortgage	24			45			—
Construction	—			476			—
Lease Financing	1			50			2
Consumer
Residential Mortgage	422			340			145
Home Equity	100			125			96
Automobile	753			842			727
Other 1	627			580			705
Total Recoveries on Loans and Leases Previously Charged-Off	2,785			2,647			2,217
Net Loans and Leases Charged-Off	(18,011		)	(25,801		)	(13,969		)
Provision for Credit Losses	20,711			26,801			24,887
Provision for Unfunded Commitments	—			—			250
Balance at End of Period 2	$	151,777		$	149,077		$	139,835

Components
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses	$	146,358		$	143,658		$	134,416
Reserve for Unfunded Commitments	5,419			5,419			5,419
Total Reserve for Credit Losses	$	151,777		$	149,077		$	139,835

Average Loans and Leases Outstanding	$	5,686,923		$	5,847,820		$	6,446,513

Ratio of Net Loans and Leases Charged-Off to Average Loans and Leases Outstanding (annualized)	1.28		%	1.75		%	0.88		%
Ratio of Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses to Loans and Leases Outstanding	2.61		%	2.49		%	2.12		%

1 Comprised of other revolving credit, installment, and lease financing.

2 Included in this analysis is activity related to the Company’s reserve for unfunded commitments, which is separately recorded in other liabilities in the Consolidated Statements of Condition.

Table of Contents

We maintain a Reserve that consists of two components, the Allowance and a Reserve for Unfunded Commitments (“Unfunded Reserve”). The Reserve provides for the risk of credit losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio and is based on loss estimates derived from a comprehensive quarterly evaluation. The evaluation reflects analyses of individual borrowers and historical loss experience, supplemented as necessary by credit judgment that considers observable trends, conditions, and other relevant environmental and economic factors.

The level of the Allowance is adjusted by recording an expense or recovery through the Provision. The level of the Unfunded Reserve is adjusted by recording an expense or recovery in other noninterest expense. The Provision exceeded net charge-offs of loans and leases for the first quarter of 2010 by $2.7 million.

Charge-off activity in our commercial lending portfolios decreased by $11.8 million in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the fourth quarter of 2009. Lower levels of charge-offs in our commercial lending portfolios in the first quarter of 2010 was primarily due to a $9.4 million charge-off of two leveraged leases recorded in the fourth quarter of 2009 related to the bankruptcy filing of an airline company.

Charge-off activity in our consumer lending portfolios increased by $4.2 million in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the fourth quarter of 2009. Higher levels of charge-offs in our consumer lending portfolios in the first quarter of 2010 was consistent with the slow, albeit stabilizing economy in Hawaii.

As of March 31, 2010, the Allowance was $146.4 million or 2.61% of total loans and leases outstanding. This represents an increase of 12 basis points from December 31, 2009 and an increase of 49 basis points from March 31, 2009. Although Hawaii’s economy shows signs of stabilization, the Allowance reflects an increased level of risk as consumers continue to be impacted by underemployment and higher levels of unemployment.

Although we determine the amount of each component of the Allowance separately, the Allowance as a whole was considered appropriate by management as of March 31, 2010, based on our ongoing analysis of estimated probable credit losses, credit risk profiles, economic conditions, coverage ratios, and other relevant factors.

The Reserve for Unfunded Commitments

Unfunded Reserve was $5.4 million as of March 31, 2010, unchanged from December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009. The process used to determine the Unfunded Reserve is

consistent with the process for determining the Allowance, as adjusted for estimated funding probabilities or loan and lease equivalency factors.

Market Risk

Market risk is the potential of loss arising from adverse changes in interest rates and prices. We are exposed to market risk as a consequence of the normal course of conducting our business activities. Our market risk management process involves measuring, monitoring, controlling, and managing risks that can significantly impact our statements of income and condition. In this management process, market risks are balanced with expected returns in an effort to enhance earnings performance, while limiting volatility. The activities associated with these market risks are categorized into “trading” and “other than trading.”

Our trading activities include foreign currency and foreign exchange contracts that expose us to a small degree of foreign currency risk. These transactions are primarily executed on behalf of customers. Our other than trading activities include normal business transactions that expose our balance sheet profile to varying degrees of market risk.

Our primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk.

Interest Rate Risk

The objective of our interest rate risk management process is to maximize net interest income while operating within acceptable limits established for interest rate risk and maintaining adequate levels of funding and liquidity.

The potential cash flows, sales, or replacement value of many of our assets and liabilities, especially those that earn or pay interest, are sensitive to changes in the general level of interest rates. This interest rate risk arises primarily from our normal business activities of gathering deposits and extending loans. Many factors affect our exposure to changes in interest rates, such as general economic and financial conditions, customer preferences, historical pricing relationships, and repricing characteristics of financial instruments.

Our earnings are affected not only by general economic conditions, but also by the monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and its agencies, particularly the Federal Reserve Bank (the “FRB”). The monetary policies of the FRB influence, to a significant extent, the overall growth of loans, investment securities, and deposits and the level of interest rates earned on assets and paid for liabilities. The nature and impact of future changes in monetary policies are generally not predictable.

Table of Contents

In managing interest rate risk, we, through the Asset/Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”), measure short and long-term sensitivities to changes in interest rates. The ALCO utilizes several techniques to manage interest rate risk, which include:

· adjusting balance sheet mix or altering the interest rate characteristics of assets and liabilities;

· changing product pricing strategies;

· modifying characteristics of the investment securities portfolio; or

· using derivative financial instruments.

The use of derivative financial instruments has generally been limited. This is due to natural on-balance sheet hedges arising out of offsetting interest rate exposures from loans, investment securities with deposits, and other interest-bearing liabilities. In particular, the investment securities portfolio is utilized to manage the interest rate exposure and sensitivity to within the guidelines and limits established by the ALCO. Natural and offsetting hedges reduce the need to employ off-balance sheet derivative financial instruments to hedge interest rate risk exposures. Expected movements in interest rates are also considered in managing interest rate risk. Thus, as interest rates change, we may use different techniques to manage interest rate risk.

A key element in our ongoing process to measure and monitor interest rate risk is the utilization of an asset/liability

simulation model. The model is used to estimate and measure the balance sheet sensitivity to changes in interest rates. These estimates are based on assumptions on the behavior of loan and deposit pricing, repayment rates on mortgage-based assets, and principal amortization and maturities on other financial instruments. The model’s analytics include the effects of standard prepayment options on mortgages and customer withdrawal options for deposits. While such assumptions are inherently uncertain, we believe that these assumptions are reasonable. As a result, the simulation model attempts to capture the dynamic nature of the balance sheet.

We utilize net interest income simulations to analyze short-term income sensitivities to changes in interest rates. Table 17 presents, as of March 31, 2010 and 2009, an estimate of the change in net interest income during a quarterly time frame that would result from a gradual change in interest rates, moving in a parallel fashion over the entire yield curve, over the next 12-month period, relative to the measured base case scenario. The base case scenario assumes the balance sheet and interest rates are generally unchanged. Based on the net interest income simulation as of March 31, 2010, net interest income sensitivity to changes in interest rates as of March 31, 2010 was less sensitive to changes in interest rates, except in scenarios where interest rates fell by more than 100 basis points, compared to the sensitivity profile as of March 31, 2009. Economic conditions and government intervention have caused interest rates to remain relatively low and has decreased market volatility.

Net Interest Income Sensitivity Profile									Table 17
	Impact on Future Quarterly Net Interest Income
(dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2010					March 31, 2009
Change in Interest Rates (basis points)
+200	$	(1,722	)	(1.6	)%	$	2,952		3.0	%
+100	(431		)	(0.4	)	1,378			1.4
-100	(323		)	(0.3	)	(886		)	(0.9	)
-200	(3,230		)	(3.0	)	(1,673		)	(1.7	)

To analyze the impact of changes in interest rates in a more realistic manner, non-parallel interest rate scenarios are also simulated. These non-parallel interest rate scenarios indicate that net interest income may decrease from the base case scenario should the yield curve flatten or become inverted for a period of time. Conversely, if the yield curve should steepen further from its mostly “normal” profile, net interest income may increase. We also use the Market Value of Equity (“MVE”) sensitivity analysis to estimate the net present value change in our net assets (i.e., assets, liabilities, and off-balance sheet instruments) from changes in interest rates. The MVE was approximately $2.1 billion as of March 31, 2010 and

approximately $1.6 billion as of March 31, 2009. Table 18 presents, as of March 31, 2010 and 2009, an estimate of the change in the MVE that would occur from an instantaneous 100 and 200 basis point increase or decrease in interest rates, moving in a parallel fashion over the entire yield curve. The MVE sensitivity decreased as of March 31, 2010 compared to March 31, 2009, as a result of changes in the balance sheet, particularly from higher investment portfolio balances. Significantly higher interest rates could reduce the value of our investment portfolio while a significant decline in interest rates effectively creates a 0% interest rate environment which could reduce the estimated value of our deposits.

Table of Contents

Market Value of Equity Sensitivity Profile									Table 18
	Change in Market Value of Equity
(dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2010					March 31, 2009
Change in Interest Rates (basis points)
+200	$	(97,067	)	(4.6	)%	$	143,892		8.8	%
+100	(9,498		)	(0.4	)	106,447			6.5
-100	(32,233		)	(1.5	)	(164,815		)	(10.1	)
-200	(84,940		)	(4.0	)	(389,170		)	(23.8	)

Further enhancing the MVE sensitivity analysis are:

· value-at-risk metrics;

· key rate analysis;

· duration of equity analysis; and

· exposure to basis risk and non-parallel yield curve shifts.

There are inherent limitations to these measures; however, used along with the MVE sensitivity analysis, we obtain better overall insight for managing our exposures to changes in interest rates. Based on the additional analyses, we estimate that our greatest exposure is in scenarios where interest rates fall significantly from current levels.

Liquidity Management

Liquidity is managed in an effort to provide continuous access to sufficient, reasonably priced funds. Funding requirements are impacted by loan originations and refinancings, liability issuances and settlements, and off-balance sheet funding commitments. We consider and comply with various regulatory guidelines regarding required liquidity levels and periodically monitor our liquidity position in light of the changing economic environment and customer activity. Based on periodic liquidity assessments, we may alter our asset, liability, and off-balance sheet positions. The ALCO monitors sources and uses of funds and modifies asset and liability positions as liquidity requirements change. This process, combined with our ability to raise funds in money and capital markets and through private placements, provides flexibility in managing the exposure to liquidity risk.

In an effort to satisfy our liquidity needs, we actively manage our assets and liabilities. The potential sources of short-term liquidity include interest-bearing deposits as well as the ability to sell certain assets including investment securities available-for-sale. Assets generate long-term liquidity through cash flows from investment securities and loans. With respect to liabilities, short-term liquidity is generated from securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short-term funding sources such as federal funds while long-term liquidity is generated through growth in deposits and long-term debt.

We strengthened our liquidity position in the first quarter of 2010, with increased levels of funding. Total deposits were $9.5 billion as of March 31, 2010, an $84.4 million increase from December 31, 2009, and a $281.3 million or 3% increase

from March 31, 2009. In 2010, we made investments in mortgage-backed securities issued by government agencies and in debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury. These investments in high grade securities with relatively short duration, allows us to maintain flexibility to redeploy funds as such opportunities arise.

Capital Management

The Company and the Bank are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can cause certain mandatory and discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a material effect on our financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative and qualitative measures. These measures were established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy. As of March 31, 2010, the Company and the Bank were “well capitalized” under this regulatory framework. There have been no conditions or events since March 31, 2010 that management believes have changed either the Company’s or the Bank’s capital classifications.

As of March 31, 2010, our shareholders’ equity was $939.4 million, a $43.4 million or 5% increase from December 31, 2009, and a $105.4 million or 13% increase from March 31, 2009. In response to a slowing economy and economic uncertainty, we began in the second half of 2008 to increase capital. As of March 31, 2010, our Tier 1 capital ratio was 15.93%, our total capital ratio was 17.20%, our leverage ratio was 6.97%, and our ratio of tangible common equity to risk-weighted assets was 16.75%.

The Parent has not repurchased shares of common stock since October 2008, except for purchases from employees in connection with income tax withholdings related to the vesting of restricted stock and shares purchased for our Rabbi Trust. As of April 13, 2010, remaining buyback authority under the Parent’s share repurchase program was $85.4 million of the total $1.70 billion repurchase amount authorized by the Parent’s Board of Directors.

In April 2010, the Parent’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.45 per share on the Parent’s outstanding shares. The dividend will be payable on June 14, 2010 to shareholders of record at the close of business on May 28, 2010.

Table of Contents

Table 19 presents our regulatory capital and ratios as of March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009, and March 31, 2009.

Regulatory Capital and Ratios								Table 19
		March 31,			December 31,			March 31,
(dollars in thousands)		2010			2009			2009
Regulatory Capital
Shareholders’ Equity		$	939,372		$	895,973		$	833,935
Less:	Goodwill	31,517			31,517			34,959
	Postretirement Benefit Liability Adjustments	5,562			5,644			6,969
	Net Unrealized Gains on Investment Securities	37,047			26,290			22,967
	Other	2,410			2,398			2,155
Tier 1 Capital		862,836			830,124			766,885
Allowable Reserve for Credit Losses		68,755			70,909			80,758
Total Regulatory Capital		$	931,591		$	901,033		$	847,643

Risk-Weighted Assets		$	5,417,394		$	5,594,532		$	6,401,527

Key Regulatory Capital Ratios
Tier 1 Capital Ratio 1		15.93		%	14.84		%	11.98		%
Total Capital Ratio 2		17.20			16.11			13.24
Leverage Ratio 3		6.97			6.76			6.92

1 Tier 1 Capital Ratio as of December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009 was revised from 14.88% and 12.02%, respectively.

2 Total Capital Ratio as of December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009 was revised from 16.15% and 13.28%, respectively.

3 Leverage Ratio as of December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009 was revised from 6.78% and 6.94%, respectively.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, Contractual Obligations, and Credit Commitments

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not participate in transactions that generate relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships. Such entities are often referred to as Variable Interest Entities (“VIEs”). We routinely sell residential mortgage loans to investors, with servicing rights retained. Sales of residential mortgage loans are generally made on a non-recourse basis.

Contractual Obligations

Our contractual obligations have not changed materially since previously reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Credit Commitments

Table 20 presents our credit commitments as of March 31, 2010.

Credit Commitments									Table 20
	Less Than						After 5
(dollars in thousands)	One Year		1-3 Years		4-5 Years		Years		Total
Unfunded Commitments to Extend Credit	$	609,337	$	300,798	$	50,032	$	1,018,859	$	1,979,026
Standby Letters of Credit	84,722		4,028		—		—		88,750
Commercial Letters of Credit	28,475		—		—		—		28,475
Total Credit Commitments	$	722,534	$	304,826	$	50,032	$	1,018,859	$	2,096,251

Table of Contents

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

See the “Market Risk” section of MD&A.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of March 31, 2010. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2010. There were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the first quarter of 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Part II - Other Information

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There are no material changes from the risk factors set forth under Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The Parent’s repurchases of equity securities for the first quarter of 2010 were as follows:

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
				Total Number of Shares	Approximate Dollar Value
				Purchased as Part of	of Shares that May Yet Be
	Total Number of	Average Price		Publicly Announced Plans	Purchased Under the
Period	Shares Purchased 1	Paid Per Share		or Programs	Plans or Programs 2
January 1 – 31, 2010	12,849	$	45.49	—	$	85,356,214
February 1 – 28, 2010	4,236	43.70		—	85,356,214
March 1 – 31, 2010	13,509	42.34		—	85,356,214
Total	30,594	$	43.85	—

1 The shares purchased in the first quarter of 2010 were shares purchased from employees in connection with option exercises paid with the Parent’s common stock, income tax withholdings related to vesting of restricted stock, and shares purchased for a Rabbi Trust. These shares were not purchased as part of the publicly announced program. The shares were purchased at the closing price of the Parent’s common stock on the dates of purchase.

2 The share repurchase program was first announced in July 2001. As of April 13, 2010, $85.4 million remained of the total $1.70 billion total repurchase amount authorized by the Parent’s Board of Directors under the share repurchase program. The program has no set expiration or termination date.

Item 6. Exhibits

A list of exhibits to this Form 10-Q is set forth on the Exhibit Index and is incorporated herein by reference.

Table of Contents

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: April 19, 2010		Bank of Hawaii Corporation


	By:	/s/ Allan R. Landon
		Allan R. Landon
		Chairman of the Board and
		Chief Executive Officer


	By:	/s/ Kent T. Lucien
		Kent T. Lucien
		Chief Financial Officer

Table of Contents

Exhibit Index

Exhibit Number

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

32		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)

Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

I, Allan R. Landon, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bank of Hawaii Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 19, 2010	/s/ Allan R. Landon
	Allan R. Landon
	Chairman of the Board and
	Chief Executive Officer

Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)

Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

I, Kent T. Lucien, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bank of Hawaii Corporation;

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 19, 2010	/s/ Kent T. Lucien
	Kent T. Lucien
	Chief Financial Officer

Exhibit 32

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

We hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-Q of Bank of Hawaii Corporation for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 (the “Periodic Report”):

· fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

· the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bank of Hawaii Corporation.

Date: April 19, 2010	/s/ Allan R. Landon
	Allan R. Landon
	Chairman of the Board and
	Chief Executive Officer


	/s/ Kent T. Lucien
	Kent T. Lucien
	Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Periodic Report or as a separate disclosure document.